We can only set the quota at the top level then? Am I understanding this correctly, as I can't set individual quotas for nested ZFS filesystems?
-----Original Message----- From: Ross Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 3:29 PM To: Burger, Matthew Ryan Cc: Matthew R. Burger; Wade, Joseph B; [email protected] Subject: Re: [cifs-discuss] Disk quotas with CIFS & ZFS Yes, you have an individual ZFS filesystem for each user. That's why the ability to fire scripts as users connect would be great - you could create the ZFS filesystem automatically the first time they connect. For now you would have to create a filesystem manually for each user (or script it somehow). ZFS pools can inherit permissions from the parent too, so if you set a quota on the main 'users' pool, each individual user will get a filesystem with a quota ready set. Regarding autohomes, I've no idea I'm afraid. I know of it, but haven't gotten to that stage of our testing yet. You can probably find a guide or two if you google it. And no, I've no idea how to move /export/home. We're not planning to mix Solaris and Windows users at all here, our Windows users will be given a completely separate area. Ross On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Burger, Matthew Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we want to create individual user quotas.... we need to create a zfs pool > for each user? Are you making them a "sub-pool (for lack of better > definition)" of a larger disk pool? > > Also, how do you do the autohomes share??? > > One last question, do you know how to move your /export/home/ directory to > point to your zfs pool, rather than the pool that it was created under? > > Thanks, > > Matt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ross Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 2:51 PM > To: Matthew R. Burger > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [cifs-discuss] Disk quotas with CIFS & ZFS > > Actually, I forgot to raise the CIFS script stuff until just recently. > I logged an RFE just last week for that: > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6766364 > > I raised another RFE too which will be needed to store Windows roaming > profiles on a ZFS server: > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6766126 > > Those are the only two bugs / RFE's that I'm actively tracking for > CIFS at the moment, we haven't really started testing it properly yet. > > Ross > > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Matthew R. Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Where does this issue stand? We are needing to the exact same thing and > would be tremendously interested to speak with anyone who has a working > implementation. >> -- >> This message posted from opensolaris.org >> _______________________________________________ >> cifs-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss >> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ cifs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
