On problem 2 - this is probably a client-side problem.  The SMB
client is probably using legacy SMB requests that cannot handle
64-bit offsets (similar to that Windows 2000 problem I mentioned).

How did you mount/map the share on the Solaris box?

Alan
--

On 12/09/08 13:30, Alan M Wright wrote:
> On 12/23/+( 11:59, Karl wrote:
>> I have been looking at using OpenSolaris 8.11 and have found a couple 
>> problems.
>>
>> Problem 1.
>>
>> Seem to have a problem copying a file that is a symlink to a vista 
>> machine. In the directory:
>>
>> /export/home/kstrauss/downloads/gnu/gcc/objDir42/i386-pc-solaris2.11/amd64/libstdc++-v3/include
>>
>> There is a linked file:
>>
>> lrwxrwxrwx   1 kstrauss staff         84 Jun 26 21:47 ios -> 
>> /export/home/kstrauss/downloads/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.2.0/libstdc++-v3/include/std/std_ios.h
> 
> Yes, currently the CIFS server cannot process symlinks to absolute
> paths.  The service will not allow you to go above the share root
> and an attempt to follow an absolute path violates that rule.  We are 
> investigating ways to deal with this:
> 
> 6705814 CIFS: full path symlinks for files within the same
>       share should be supported
> 
>> when trying to access the file from a vista machine I get:
>>
>> C:\temp\sxc\solaris>type 
>> "s:\kstrauss\downloads\gnu\gcc\objDir42\i386-pc-solaris2.11\amd64\libstdc++-v3\include\ios"
>>
>> The system cannot find the file specified.
>>
>> Problem 2.
>>
>> Trouble working with files greater than 4gb. For example if I mount a 
>> share from an XP machine and do the following:
>>
>> Cat largefile > /dev/null
>>
>> This task runs forever. Looking through filemon on the XP machine the 
>> file offset being requested by the solaris box flips back over to 0.
>>
>> Are these known problems or is this because of my incompetence? If the 
>> latter some help would be much appreciated.
> 
> This was a problem with the original release of Windows 2000 due to
> the use of SMB requests that are limited to 32-bit offsets.  It was
> fixed in a service pack (IIRC, SP2).   This may be something similar.
> 
> We will investigate.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alan
> _______________________________________________
> cifs-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss

_______________________________________________
cifs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss

Reply via email to