Thanks Afshin, this is what I thought. I fixed it for Nexenta though and will be uploading new packages shortly - for those who is using NexentaCore.
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 17:31 -0800, Afshin Salek wrote: > > Erast Benson wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 15:52 -0800, Afshin Salek wrote: > >> Here are the CRs about the problem: > >> > >> 6800211 CIFS server does not respond to the Windows client request to map > > > > could you please give us more details on what FVT test is failing? > > > > Since you have to access a share before [virtually] doing anything, most > tests would fail. Specifically, if you map a share from one client you > would not be able to map a share from another client. Mapping would fail > and the CIFS service will be restarted which you might not notice. > > >> 6800942 smb_session_create() incorrectly stores IP addresses > > > > this one is trivial to fix though, but could it be that it is causing > > 6800211? > > > > Yes, it is the cause and it's mentioned in the Evaluation of the > 6800211. We already have a fix but it would go to snv_109 since > snv_108 is already closed. > > Afshin > > > Thank you > > > >> Afshin > >> > >> Afshin Salek wrote: > >>> Due to a regression w.r.t one of the CIFS fixes integrated in snv_108, > >>> you will certainly run into problem accessing shares in this build so > >>> if you are planning to upgrade, please skip this build. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Afshin > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> cifs-discuss mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss > >> _______________________________________________ > >> cifs-discuss mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss > >> > > > _______________________________________________ cifs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
