>I like opensolaris for its upgrade process, which I consider to be
>simpler than Nevada.  Thus, I run osol0906 upgraded to b117.  I don't
>plan to upgrade in the immediate future, because it's stable for my
>workload and I don't think any features I need are likely to come out.
>
>b117 fixes all the CIFS-related problems I've had in the past.

Appreciate that info. So you are seeing good reliability with osol in the
enterprise? That's good to know, the CIFS feature is so compelling, I have
long awaited an alternative to Samba!

Thanks!
jlc
_______________________________________________
cifs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss

Reply via email to