Another clarification

They use sudo scripts for execution which probably use group permissions.

sundeep

On 5/13/2010 8:41 AM, sundeep dhall wrote:
Afshin,

I checked with my customer on this.
It seems they are interested in being able to delegate authentication to the solaris server to AD using kerberos and on the solaris server, they have scripts that would query the uid, primary gid, secondary gid for the user.
and then execute using those permissions.

Today they use SAMBA to achieve the authentication portion.

They do not need access to samba-like shares on the solaris server

Is this narrow requirement set possible in the current implementation using b134 ? - If so, would I only need to use the "kclient" script to setup the authentication to AD ?

sundeep

On 5/11/2010 5:21 PM, Afshin Salek wrote:


Afshin

On 05/11/10 02:54 PM, sundeep dhall wrote:
Afshin,

I am coming to grips with the various terms, so please bear with me.

What I want to currently prototype is the following:-
- osol server authentication using kerberos against AD. User repo only
on AD
- retrieval of user and group attributes from AD.
-- ie getent or other similar calls on solaris would give me the uid,
gid set on AD
- password resets done on AD would be reflected on the osol side when
the user attempts to authenticate.

It seems that this setup was originally done using a script called
ADjoin (now deprecated) and is now done vis kclient
Q) Does this much work today ? either in 2009.06 or later ?

I am presuming that what you describe as not currently supported is the
following
- AD is domain controller and is used for authentication
- OpenSolaris server is a CIFS (SMB) server operating in domain mode


Yes, that is what I'm referring to. So I'm not sure what you are
referring to as "osol server authentication using kerberos against AD".
Is there any SMB file access involved here in your prototype? What kind
of access to Osol are you trying to authenticate against AD using Kerberos?

If that is so, then I presume that the CIFS capability works today in
workgroup mode where users repository is on the osol side.


There is no AD or kerberos is involved in workgroup mode. SMB server
performs the authentication against the local /var/smb/smbpasswd

Afshin

Please validate

thank you
sundeep

On 05/11/10 04:37 PM, Afshin Salek wrote:
Kerberos authentication for SMB users connecting to Solaris SMB server
is under development, so it's not currently supported.

Afshin

On 05/11/10 02:27 PM, sundeep dhall wrote:
Hi Alan,

Thank you for the flag.
I am downloading b134 from genunix.org

I have setup AD on Win2008r2 as well as DNS

The intent is to show that users will be created in AD
Once osol is integrated with the AD as a kerberos client for
authentication, users will be able to login into osol via their auth
to AD.

I have skimmed through the docs on setting up kerberos client for AD
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-3321/ggtwg?l=en&a=view

Q1)I am presuming that perhaps prior to this, the only step required on
the osol side would be to
setup nsswitch.conf and resolv.conf.

Is that correct ?

Q2) How does the CIFS setup on domain-mode work in conjunction to the
above methodology ?
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-2429/configuredomainmodetask?l=en&a=view



Is that a 2ndary step I could do to show CIFS file sharing, or do the
latter steps call kclient internally ?

thank you
sundeep



On 05/11/10 03:20 PM, Alan Wright wrote:
On 05/11/10 08:34 AM, sundeep dhall wrote:
All,

Intent is to demonstrate OpenSolaris2009.06 authentication with AD on
Win2008r2 and UID, GID access based on user creation in AD

For use with Windows, it would be better to upgrade to something
more recent than OpenSolaris 2009.06. The SMB support in 2009.06
is broken.

Alan

I am reading up on the following for kclient
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-3321/setup-341?a=view

But my question is more on the AD side.
I have setup AD on the demo machine.

Q) In 2003, there was a SFU that enabled the AD to have the schema
for unix
Is a similar setting required for 2008 ?
Pointers to where this needs to be done would be appreciated.

thank you
sundeep


_______________________________________________
cifs-discuss mailing list
cifs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss


_______________________________________________
cifs-discuss mailing list
cifs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss


_______________________________________________
cifs-discuss mailing list
cifs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss

_______________________________________________
cifs-discuss mailing list
cifs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss

Reply via email to