Hi Metze, Thanks for your question!
I'll be reviewing the information and I will let you know about my findings as soon as I have news. Thanks! Sebastian Canevari Support Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 7100 N Hwy 161, Irving, TX - 75039 "Las Colinas - LC2" Tel: +1 469 775 7849 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We're hiring -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefan (metze) Metzmacher Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 6:24 AM To: Interoperability Documentation Help; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [cifs-protocol] Correction, assistance request: MS-DRSR Partial Attribute Set Hi, I was testing the behavior of the pPartialAttrSet and pPartialAttrSetEx members of DRS_MSG_GETCHGREQ_V8. Please document what the difference between two is! Is it necessary to pass the PrefixTableDest, when passing pPartialAttrSet and/or pPartialAttrSet? What happens when the PrefixTableDest is missing? Testing shows that the pPartialAttrSet is ignored if DRS_WRIT_REP is set in ulFlags. Is it somehow possible to replicate just the "unicodePwd" attribute? If I skip the DRS_WRIT_REP flag I'm getting only empty attribute values. If I add the DRS_WRIT_REP I'm getting all attributes. Stefan Metzmacher - Samba Team
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
