On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 15:31 -0700, John Dunning wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > I wanted to touch bases with you to let you know that I am > researching your question. In your email you indicated that Windows XP > seems to take care of the sequence numbers correctly and I wanted to > make sure I understood this. Are you saying that you are only seeing > this behavior with Vista? Would it be possible for you to obtain a > network trace of the case where it fails; when you don’t add 1 to the > sequence number around line 690 of your code?
That is the trace already supplied. (As we fault anyway, just a few more lines down the gsskrb5_unwrap() processing, , because we don't match the checksum, even if we match the sequence number) Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
