On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 12:01 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote: > I found the problem, windows doesn't fill in the RRC field correctly. > > Windows rotates by EC+RRC, e.g. EC=16 and RRC=28. > > Samba sends EC=0 and RRC=28 and windows was happy with it > and samba would have been happy if windows would send EC=16 RRC=44. > > It seems to only matter for DCERPC where EC is !=0, > as LDAP works fine as windows sends EC=0. > > I have tested what happens when samba uses EC=16 for LDAP too, > and windows is also only happy if we rotate by EC+RRC. > > So the windows behavior doesn't match RFC4121...
Metze: Did we get this working, and do we still think Microsoft is in violation of the RFC? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
