Hi Andrew,
I'd like to provide you with both a confirmation on your finding and an answer
to your question:
1) Level #4 corresponds to NetlogonValidationGenericInfo and IS defined
in the _NETLOGON_VALIDATION_INFO_CLASS. In fact, it has the same behavior as
NetlogonValidationGenericInfo2 = 5.
We'll update our documentation accordingly in future releases.
2) With regards to the question about the restrictions in the
validationlevel for the different logonlevels:
These logonlevels:
NetlogonInteractiveInformation:
NetlogonInteractiveTransitiveInformation:
NetlogonNetworkInformation:
NetlogonNetworkTransitiveInformation:
NetlogonServiceInformation:
NetlogonServiceTransitiveInformation:
Accept these ValidationLevels
NetlogonValidationSamInfo:
NetlogonValidationSamInfo2:
NetlogonValidationSamInfo4:
AND NetlogonGenericInformation accepts:
NetlogonValidationGenericInfo:
NetlogonValidationGenericInfo2:
Please let me know if I can be of further assistance.
Thanks and regards,
Sebastian Canevari
Support Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
7100 N Hwy 161, Irving, TX - 75039
"Las Colinas - LC2"
Tel: +1 469 775 7849
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We're hiring
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Bartlett
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 6:10 AM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [cifs-protocol] What happened to SamLogon validation level 4?
In MS-NRPC 2.2.1.4.17 NETLOGON_VALIDATION_INFO_CLASS it states:
The NETLOGON_VALIDATION_INFO_CLASS enumeration selects the type of logon
information
block being used.
typedef enum _NETLOGON_VALIDATION_INFO_CLASS
{
NetlogonValidationUasInfo = 1,
NetlogonValidationSamInfo = 2,
NetlogonValidationSamInfo2 = 3,
NetlogonValidationGenericInfo2 = 5,
NetlogonValidationSamInfo4 = 6
} NETLOGON_VALIDATION_INFO_CLASS;
However, level 4 is missing. It appears however in the wireshark dissector
(and therefore in our IDL). What is the history here?
Also, what restrictions are there on choice of validation level for the
different logon levels available into a SamLogon* call?
Thanks,
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
