On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 12:36 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote: > Andrew, > > >> Andrew, > >> > >> Does this mean that you cannot duplicate the issue any more ? > > >Correct. However, my original reporter still reproduces the issue. > > Could you explain a little bit more about this ? If you put > everything back to original condition, you can still see the problem > with XP ADCU.
For me, I now have success all the time. Presumably the client cached something, or is simply non-deterministic. > After some changes made to schema, the problem doesn't occur any > more. Is my understanding right ? I wish :-). According to my reporter, he still gets failures, in old versions and new. I've CC'ed him so he can clarify the situation. > Should I still concentrate on the original condition under which we have a > capture ? > > Is it possible for you to send us a network trace for the current successful > condition so we can compare ? I think the trace is the same (as I get success regardless of new or old code), but I'll see what I can do. The bug tracking this (with a few distractions) is: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5713 Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
