Good Afternoon Ronnie: I am still waiting for your response. We need this info to move forward on this case.
Thanks Obaid Farooqi Sr. SEE | Microsoft -----Original Message----- From: Obaid Farooqi Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 7:40 AM To: 'ronnie sahlberg' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: MS-SAMR missing SID name use type ? Good Morning Ronnie: I haven't received the information I requested in the following email. Please provide the information. We need this to move forward in this case. Thanks Obaid Farooqi Sr. SEE | Microsoft -----Original Message----- From: Obaid Farooqi Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 10:45 AM To: ronnie sahlberg Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MS-SAMR missing SID name use type ? Hi Ronnie: I need some clarification on your question. Please provide the answers to following questions: 1. Please specify the setup in which you see this in wireshark. 2. The exact scenario in which you see it. 3. Please send Wireshark or netmon trace where you see this emun member. Please also specify frame and byte where you see it. Thanks Obaid Farooqi -----Original Message----- From: ronnie sahlberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:35 AM To: Interoperability Documentation Help Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MS-SAMR missing SID name use type ? Hi, I am a pfif subcontractor. The IDL in MS-SAMR describes the types of sids as : typedef enum _SID_NAME_USE { SidTypeUser = 1, SidTypeGroup, SidTypeDomain, SidTypeAlias, SidTypeWellKnownGroup, SidTypeDeletedAccount, SidTypeInvalid, SidTypeUnknown, } SID_NAME_USE, *PSID_NAME_USE; I believe there might be one additional value for this enum to describe a sid for a machine/computer : SidTypeComputer = 9 (or something similar) This assumption is based on Wireshark and Samba4 code. regards ronnie sahlberg _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
