On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 20:59 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Ronnie, > > > However, both Wireshark and also Samba4 IDL files contain hints that > > there should be more procedures on this interface : > > > > /* Function 0x4b */ > > NTSTATUS lsa_CREDRRENAME(); > > > > /* Function 0x4c */ > > NTSTATUS lsa_LookupSids3( > > > > /* Function 0x4d */ > > NTSTATUS lsa_LookupNames4( > > note that some of these are in MS-LSAT instead of MS-LSAD. > > I haven't checked that they are all there, but some of the key ones > are.
It is certainly unfortunate that this apparent artefact of some per-protocol licence program spills over into the IDL. Could we please have the full IDL (and preferably the full protocol) reproduced in a single place, or at least the stubs cross-referenced? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
