On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 14:02 -0800, Obaid Farooqi wrote: > Hi Andrew: > Please let us know whether the following explanation answers your question.
Not really (because the buck is passed to APDS, but not received there), but I really don't care either. It is an interesting historical detail, that's all. > Hi Andrew: > We have concluded our investigation on the question you raised about MS-APDS. > > Modification to [MS-NRPC] about NetlogonServiceInformation explain why we do > not use them. > In MS-APDS we specify what is used by each protocol. By design we do not > specify LogonLevels that are not used. > > While it is true that [MS-APDS] uses [MS-NRPC], there is no mention of > NetlogonServiceInformation in [MS-APDS]. As such, there is no proper place or > context in [MS-APDS] to mention the fact that none of the protocols described > in this document use NetlogonServiceInformation. While the historian and pedant in me is dissatisfied, I'm otherwise quite happy for this to be concluded here, I don't see any reason to waste any more time on this bit of history. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
