Andrew, We will rename POSSSUPNOSUBCLASSES to make it easier to read by adding underscore as you suggested. It will appear in a future release of MS-ADTS document. Thanks for your suggestion!!
Thanks! Hongwei -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 1:34 AM To: Hongwei Sun Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - problem with MS-ADTS docs on possibleInferiors On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 16:03 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote: > Tridge, > > Thanks for pointing out the problem in the description of POSSSUPERIORS(). > We revised the definition of the function in section 3.1.1.4.2 of future > release of MS-ADTS. Please let us know if there is any problem. Can you please rename POSSSUPNOSUBCLASSES? It's a real mouthful and really, really painful to read. A few underscores would make the world of difference. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
