Thanks! That change is indeed set for the upcoming release. Nice to work with you again...
Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 -----Original Message----- From: Steve French [mailto:smfre...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 1:54 PM To: Bill Wesse Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org Subject: Re: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Bill Wesse <bil...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Good day once again Mr. French! I have verified that our [MS-SMB] working > document has already incorporated the necessary deletion of the DialectCount > field (2.2.4). The changes will be available in a future document refresh; > notifications concerning protocol documentation updates to the Open > Specifications are announced via our Protocols Perspective e-Newsletter. > > I also checked Network Monitor 3.3 smb2.npl, which has the 'struct > SMB2ResponseNegotiate.DialectCount' field defined, and have filed a bug > against that. Please read on for further information about this! > > Thank you very much for bringing this to our attention. Please let me know if > this answers your question satisfactorily; > so, I will consider your question resolved. Sounds fine. Note that the most recently released (dated 4/11 but only released in last few weeks or less) MS-SMB2.pdf still contains this error, so I will look for it in the May updates. -- Thanks, Steve _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
