Good morning Andrew! I have created case SRX090529600007 against [MS-ADTS]. My colleague Richard Guthrie will be your contact for this, and will contact you shortly.
Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:39 PM To: Richard Guthrie Cc: Interoperability Documentation Help; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: erroneous references to little-endian On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 06:03 -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote: > Andrew, > > We have completed our investigation and have updated the documentation > to remove references that specify a parameter as little endian where > the values endianess is negotiated by the underlying RPC protocol as > we discussed previously. Here is the list of fields in which the endianess > text was removed: Thankyou. However, have you made investigations to see if this has occurred in any other protocols? For example, MS-ADTS 7.3.1.1 continues the fine tradition of claiming to present a bit table in little endian, but it is actually big-endian (and is an integer string on LDAP, and little-endian in the NBT netlogon dgram 7.3.1.4). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
