On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 18:52 -0800, Richard Guthrie wrote: > Andrew, > > Thanks for the question. I will create a case for this shortly and an > engineer will get in touch with you to begin working this issue. > > Richard Guthrie > Escalation Engineer > > ________________________________________ > From: Andrew Bartlett [[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 7:10 PM > To: Interoperability Documentation Help > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: How is a krb5 request to cifs/my.realm handled? > > A number of our users are having trouble with group policy in Samba4, > and it seems that their clients (WinXP, Vista) look for their group > policy information in //my.realm/sysvol > > This name resolves in DNS, but we don't currently have a mapping for it > in our KDC, because I don't know, if I were to create a mixed > Microsoft/Samba4 domain what key this would resolve to. > > Given that it must be shared between all domain controllers, is this > somehow mapped to krbtgt/my.realm? Is DNS/my.realm also handled this > way? > > (In the meantime it would of course be trivial to add such a mapping, > but I want to solve this properly)
Has there been any progress on this? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
