I regret that the documents couldn't be delivered in the time frame I gave you - and apologize for not updating you on progress earlier this week.
Everyone I've worked with here concerning the document delivery dislikes delays. Even when necessary/obligatory diligence interferes. I have to defer to Hongwei for the next step. Have a great weekend all! Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org] Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 5:46 PM To: Bill Wesse Cc: tri...@samba.org; m...@samba.org; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Hongwei Sun Subject: RE: Status: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 07:48 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote: > I will be out of the office on vacation, returning Monday, September 7. My > colleague, Hongwei Sun will be your contact during my absence. Thanks for the heads up. But over a week ago you promised: > Good morning - and thanks for your patience. We are nearly complete with the > property rights notice for the display specifiers ldf. > > I expect to be able to make the final documents available to you within 3-5 > working days! I realise there is little you can do while you wait on lawyers, but I'm worried worried: Will the delay be this long every time we try to clarify the release of this kind of thing? (And we are yet to tell if the final form of the documents will be suitable - legally or technically!). Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Cisco Inc. _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
