Thanks for the update - my Win7 client is also Ultimate, with no updates.

On another note, I just finished an initial debug on srv.sys; I have 
considerable analysis to do on the results, specifically tracking down the 
handles (just to make sure - even though there are no handle failures in either 
standard or SMB_INFO_PASSTHROUGH FileEndOfFileInformation information level for 
TRANS2_SET_PATH_INFORMATION).

There are additional functional checks on the information level, when less than 
SMB_INFO_PASSTHROUGH, which I still need to run down in the documentation.

I doubt I will be able to finish my work today, and do expect to be able to 
provide some reasonable information early next week.

Of course, this is all about what is supposed to be allowed when a client 
requests a 'native Windows NT operating system information level' ([MS-SMB] 
Appendix A note <158>: 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc246806(PROT.13).aspx).

I have thus far not been able to find any specific commentary on this in the 
WDK documentation (but then, I am not a driver expert).

Thanks for your patience!

Regards,
Bill Wesse
MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
8055 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
TEL:  +1(980) 776-8200
CELL: +1(704) 661-5438
FAX:  +1(704) 665-9606

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Prouty [mailto:tim.pro...@isilon.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 12:20 PM
To: Bill Wesse
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [Pfif] SMB1 Trans2SetPathInfo() FileEndOfFileInformation is not 
enforcing share modes


On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Bill Wesse wrote:

> I have retested without SmbSecuritySignatures - results were the same.
>
> I will hold off on the WordCount/ByteCount truncation against the  
> Dos INVALID_LEVEL error problem  
> (trans2setpathinfo_against_win7_2.pcap) for the time being, and work  
> on the sharing issue (I expect to be soaking in code for the next  
> day or so).

My win7 is a fresh ultimate install with no updates.  I'm going to run  
windows update to see if I can reproduce it.  I'll let you know what I  
find out.

-Tim

_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol

Reply via email to