Good day Andrew! Please note that my colleague Sebastian is out of the office for the next few days. In the interim, I will be your contact. Thanks in advance for your patience!
We submitted a Technical Document Inquiry (TDI) ~2 weeks ago, on Jan 14. I just sent a status update request for the TDI, and will advise you as soon as I receive a response. Thanks for your patience! Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 Email: [email protected] Tel: +1(980) 776-8200 Cell: +1(704) 661-5438 Fax: +1(704) 665-9606 -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 4:37 PM To: Sebastian Canevari Subject: RE: RID Allocation behaviour On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 18:22 +0000, Sebastian Canevari wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Can you please let me know if this response answers your question or if you > need further clarification? Well, firstly, the answer needs to be in the WSPP documentation set. Secondly I don't think it answers the particular points I asked about - it describes the attributes (good) but not the behaviour and responsibilities. Some of this is implied by an attribute being non-replicated, but this needs to be in the docs, and explicitly described. Andrew Bartlett _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
