I note that both MIT and Heimdal are using this (assigned) ad-type for another purpose in a shipping implementation. Why wasn't a formally assigned or private use number used here?
-- Luke On 13/03/2010, at 12:53 AM, simo wrote: > Dear Dochelp, > while researching forest trust relationships between a Windows 2008 R2 > Domain Controller and a Samba 4 Domain Controller I found out that the > Windows domain controller creates Kerberos packets containing an unknown > auth data type 142 > > MS-KILE references types 141 and 143 in section "3.2.5.5 AP Exchange", > but I could fine no mention of 142. > > Can you please document it ? > > Thanks, > Simo. > > -- > Simo Sorce > Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <[email protected]> > Principal Software Engineer at Red Hat, Inc. <[email protected]> > > _______________________________________________ > cifs-protocol mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol > -- www.padl.com | www.thisismagnolia.net _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
