Nadya,
The definition of the valid systemFlags can be found in 2.2.10 and 2.2.11 of
MS-ADTS. The numeric values of the two flags you mentioned are:
PS (FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER or FLAG_CR_NTDS_DOMAIN,
0x00000002) 2.2.10 MS-ADTS System Flags
CR (FLAG_ATTR_IS_CRITICAL, 0x00000001)
2.2.11 MS-ADTS schemaFlagsEx Flags
Please let us know if you have more questions.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Nadezhda Ivanova
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 7:07 AM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [cifs-protocol] Numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER
Hi,
I am not able to find the actual numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_IS_CRITICAL
(systemFlagsEx) and FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER for systemFlags. I am
working on access checks for DRS replication and this blocks my work, so I
would appreciate a fast response...
Regards,
Nadya
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
