I think you are right, but it is still a bit confusing. Anyway, I finally got it :).
----- Original Message ----- > From: Luke Howard <[email protected]> > To: Nadezhda Ivanova <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, > [email protected] <[email protected]>, > [email protected] <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2010 1:19:03 PM (GMT+02:00) Helsinki, Kyiv, Riga, > Sofia, Tallinn, Vilnius > Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110040646791367] : RE: Numerical value of > FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER > > On 07/04/2010, at 11:02 AM, Nadezhda Ivanova wrote: > > > Hi Hongwei, > > Thanks a lot! I suppose I got confused because 2.2.10 states: > > PS (FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER or FLAG_CR_NTDS_DOMAIN, > 0x00000002) > > I was not sure if both flags have the same value, or the value is > just for FLAG_CR_NTDS_DOMAIN. > > My understanding is that the flag meaning depends on the context (ie. > the object class). So the same values may have completely different > meanings for different classes. > > -- Luke _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
