Hi Andreas:
We have finished our investigation on your question regarding cAddNetPrinters.
A future version of MS-RPRN will include modification along the lines of the
following:
Section "3.1.4.2.3 RpcAddPrinter" will have the following bullet added to it:
"Increment the number of network printers added to this server."
The description for Level member of the PRINTER_CONTAINER when its value is
0x00000001 will be consolidated and will be something like the following (with
the addition of the above mentioned bullet):
If the value of the Level member of the PRINTER_CONTAINER is 0x00000001, and if
the server does not maintain a "List of Known Printers", the server MUST return
ERROR_PRINTER_ALREADY_EXISTS, as specified in [MS-ERREF]. Otherwise, the server
MUST continue to process the message and compose a response to the client as
follows:
* If the PRINTER_ATTRIBUTE_SHARED bit is set in the Flags member of the
PRINTER_INFO_1 structure,
add the printer<185> to the "List of Known Printers" as specified in
section 3.1.1.
* If PRINTER_ATTRIBUTE_SHARED bit is not set in the Flags member of the
PRINTER_INFO_1 structure,
remove the printer from the "List of Known Printers".
* Store NULL in the output parameter pointed to by pHandle.
* Increment the number of network printers added to this server.
* Return ERROR_PRINTER_ALREADY_EXISTS, as specified in [MS-ERREF].
Note: An error return code is required by remote procedure call (RPC) because
NULL was stored to the output parameter pointed to by pHandle.
Please let me know if it answers your question. If it does, I'll consider this
issue resolved.
Thanks
Obaid Farooqi
Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Schneider [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 3:11 AM
To: Obaid Farooqi
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [REG: 210041353965669001 ]RE: MS-RPRN: Question on
PRINTER_INFO_STRESS.cAddNetPrinters
On Wednesday 21 April 2010 01:13:21 Obaid Farooqi wrote:
> Hi Andreas:
Hi Obaid,
> Just an update. I am still working on your issue. As soon as I have
> something concrete, I'll be in touch.
thanks for the update. It looks like Windows 2008 R2 always return 0 for that
value. So it would be interesting which Windows version return which value and
which of them expect it to be set.
Best regards,
-- andreas
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
