Hello Stefan; thank you for your questions regarding the [MS-SMB] protocol specification. One of my colleagues will be in touch with you shortly, and will provide the service request name and number.
Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 Email: [email protected] Tel: +1(980) 776-8200 Cell: +1(704) 661-5438 Fax: +1(704) 665-9606 -----Original Message----- From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 8:32 AM To: Interoperability Documentation Help Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Handling of STATUS_BUFFER_OVERFLOW on SMB_COM_READ_ANDX Hi, I need some help regarding the interaction of STATUS_BUFFER_OVERFLOW and chained SMB requests. For SMB_COM_READ_ANDX requests on named pipes it can happen that the server has to return STATUS_BUFFER_OVERFLOW (see MS-CIFS 3.3.5.35 Receiving an SMB_COM_READ_ANDX Request). Are chained requests possible in this case? As there's only one status field for all requests in the chain, it's not clear how a server should handle such a situation. metze _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
