Matthieu, I will be on vacation from Wednesday (06/22) until July 22. We can either archive it until I come back or I can transfer the case to one of my teammate. Please let me know what you prefer.
Thanks! Hongwei -----Original Message----- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 3:48 PM To: Hongwei Sun Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; MSSolve Case Email Subject: Re: [REG:110051073884304] RE: About GPMC and ACLs Hi Hongwei, Sorry didn't had the time on this, next week didn't seems the good one either, can you reping me at next monday (28th) ? Regards. Matthieu. On 19/06/2010 03:59, Hongwei Sun wrote: > Matthieu, > > Do you have any update for this topic ? If you don't have time to look at > this issue, I may archive this case and we may visit it again after I come > back from my vocation in July. I am leaving after next Tuesday. If you > prefer, I can also transfer this case to one of my team member to continue > the investigation. > > Thanks! > > Hongwei > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hongwei Sun > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 6:05 PM > To: '[email protected]'; [email protected]; [email protected] > Cc: MSSolve Case Email > Subject: RE: [REG:110051073884304] RE: About GPMC and ACLs > > Hi, Matthieu, > > I have downloaded the GPMC with SP1 from the following link > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=0a6d4c24-8cbd-4b35-9272-dd3cbfc81887&DisplayLang=en > and installed it on a XP machine. I ran the same testing by opening a GPO > on a Windows 2008 DC from GPMC in XP. The attached network trace shows that > the tool never queried the security descriptor of the main policy folder. I > cannot find the query in code either. Could you verify if you are using the > same GPMC download as I used ? And it will be good if you can run GPMC > against a Windows DC to see if you can see the same behavior. > > Please let me know. > > Thanks! > > Hongwei > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 3:35 AM > To: Hongwei Sun; [email protected]; [email protected] > Cc: MSSolve Case Email > Subject: Re: [REG:110051073884304] RE: About GPMC and ACLs > > Hello hongwei, > > It's downloaded from internet as the one which comes with the administration > pack is "limited". > > Version seems to be 1.0.2 (from GPMC.msc then help then about group policy > management). > > Matthieu. > On 02/06/2010 02:59, Hongwei Sun wrote: > >> Matthieu, >> >> Any update ? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Hongwei >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Hongwei Sun >> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 6:01 PM >> To: 'Matthieu Patou' >> Cc: MSSolve Case Email >> Subject: RE: [REG:110051073884304] RE: About GPMC and ACLs >> >> Matthieu, >> >> I spent some time to investigate the behavior you reported. I created >> multiple Windows DCs (Windows 2008 and Windows 2008 R2) and used GPMC to >> open policies on remote DCs. From the network captures , I don't see any >> SMB packet for querying the SecurityDescriptor of {Domain}\Policy folder. >> It only checks the individual policy folder. As I understand , Window XP >> doesn't include GPMC tool by default and user has to install it. Which >> version of the GPMC tool are you using ? Could you find the version number >> from the "Help" menu ? >> >> Also could you run GPMC from a Windows 2008 or Windows 2008 R2 machine >> to see if there is any difference ? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Hongwei >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 5:11 AM >> To: Hongwei Sun >> Cc: MSSolve Case Email >> Subject: Re: [REG:110051073884304] RE: About GPMC and ACLs >> >> On 15/05/2010 07:19, Hongwei Sun wrote: >> >> >>> Matthieu, >>> >>> It takes a while to get back to normal after travel headache on my >>> way back to U.S. I spent some time to double check again the logic used >>> for checking DS/FS ACL consistency. I still didn't see the SD of the >>> SYSVOL\policies folder is checked explicitly in the logic. Only the >>> SYSVOL\Policies\ {GUID} is queried explicitly and used in the logic. I >>> suspect that it is queried for some other reason. I will have to set up >>> the environment to repro the SMB traffic and debug further. What OS do >>> you use for the testing in the trace ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >> It was Windows XP SP2. >> Did you see in the trace that there is somehow a smb call to get the >> NTACLS of<domain>\Policies ? >> Also I'm not sure it's present in this trace but I had one (lost >> because stored in /tmp) when I hit "OK please correct the rotten acls" >> that showed that GPMC was trying to set several ACLs on the GPO >> folder (rather different one from the previous one). >> >> Matthieu. >> >> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Hongwei >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 5:09 PM >>> To: Hongwei Sun >>> Subject: About GPMC and ACLs >>> >>> Hongwei, >>> >>> Here is the capture, >>> >>> The most interesting is from packet 873, when I retry to click on a newly >>> created GPO. >>> At packet 1025 I receive the message that there is a mismatch and I click >>> ok to get it fixed. >>> >>> The capture ends when the data flow stop. >>> >>> As I told you, at packet 1101 and packet 1119 you can see that windows >>> tries to put two differents ACL (at least != number of ACEs but there is >>> one on S-1-3-0 also). >>> >>> We can see in the capture that around the moment that GPMC is checking the >>> DS/FS acl consistency that it also have a look at the<domain>\Policies >>> folder. >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>> Matthieu. >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > Matthieu Patou > Samba Team http://samba.org > > > -- Matthieu Patou Samba Team http://samba.org _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
