Hi Matthias,
Thanks for your question. Someone from our group will contact you to follow up on this later. Regards, Sebastian ________________________________________ From: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer [[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 3:58 AM To: Interoperability Documentation Help Cc: [email protected] Subject: MS-SAMR: QueryDisplayInfo vs. EnumDomainGroups Hi dochelp team, we've a testsuite which compares the output of QueryDisplayInfo (MS name: "SamrQueryDisplayInformation3") level 3 and 5 ("DomainDisplayGroup", "DomainDisplayOemGroup") against EnumDomainGroups (MS name: "SamrEnumerateGroupsInDomain"). These calls should be fetching all (domain) global and unversal groups and therefore yield the *same* result. On s4 our test passes without any trouble, but on Windows Server 2008 it doesn't. I'm getting this against a Server 2008 German edition: > WARNING!: QueryDisplayInfo gave name [$FJ5000-BBTG1H1LI2BG] that > EnumDomainGroups did not > > WARNING!: QueryDisplayInfo gave name [DnsUpdateProxy] that > EnumDomainGroups did not > > WARNING!: QueryDisplayInfo gave name [Domänen-Admins] that > EnumDomainGroups did not > > WARNING!: QueryDisplayInfo gave name [Domänen-Benutzer] that > EnumDomainGroups did not > > WARNING!: QueryDisplayInfo gave name [Domänen-Gäste] that > EnumDomainGroups did not > > WARNING!: QueryDisplayInfo gave name [Domänencomputer] that > EnumDomainGroups did not > > WARNING!: QueryDisplayInfo gave name [Domänencontroller] that > EnumDomainGroups did not > > WARNING!: QueryDisplayInfo gave name [Domänencontroller der > Organisation ohne Schreibzugriff] that EnumDomainGroups did not > > WARNING!: QueryDisplayInfo gave name [Domänencontroller ohne > Schreibzugriff] that EnumDomainGroups did not > > WARNING!: QueryDisplayInfo gave name [Organisations-Admins] that > EnumDomainGroups did not > > WARNING!: QueryDisplayInfo gave name [Richtlinien-Ersteller-Besitzer] > that EnumDomainGroups did not > > WARNING!: QueryDisplayInfo gave name [Schema-Admins] that > EnumDomainGroups did not These are all global and universal group objects which should be returned by the call EnumDomainGroups (see MS-SAMR 3.1.5.2.3). So my question: could there be a misconfiguration that EnumDomainGroups doesn't return the correct result? Or is there a bug? Thanks, Matthias Wallnöfer _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
