Tridge, I created SR 110122270441425 to track the RANK question. What is your priority on this issue? Is this presently blocking you?
Bryan -----Original Message----- From: Bryan Burgin Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 10:07 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; MSSolve Case Email Subject: RE: [REG:110122152819123] dwFlags in dnsRecord; use of dnsNode.dwReserved field I'll resolve the dwFlags/dwResreved issue (110122152819123) and research this new Rank question in a new case. B. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 5:17 PM To: Bryan Burgin Cc: [email protected]; MSSolve Case Email Subject: Re: [REG:110122152819123] dwFlags in dnsRecord; use of dnsNode.dwReserved field Hi Bryan, The new format makes sense, thanks! > Rank: : 0x00 > : 0x08 RANK_ROOT_HINT > : 0x80 RANK_GLUE > : 0x82 RANK_NS_GLUE > : 0xf0 RANK_ZONE the description of the rank values is in [MS-DNSP], but there is nothing there that I can see on how the rank affects processing. Does the DNS server change how it handles a record based on the rank? Cheers, Tridge _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
