On 03/10/2011 22:32, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Matthieu
We completed the investigation of the error code and updated the document
with the following changes:
1. Section 2.2.3.2 CHANGE_ORDER_COMMAND
Added the CO_FLAG_INSTALL_INCOMPLETE flag to the flags value and
meaning table.
CO_FLAG_INSTALL_INCOMPLETE 0x00000080 The installation of the
change order on the downstream partner is incomplete.
2. [MS-FRS1] Section 3.3.4.4.9 COMM_COMMAND Is CMD_REMOTE_CO_DONE
FROM:
"The receiving partner MUST be the upstream partner. This indicates the
downstream partner has processed this change order. FRS MUST remove the change order from
the Outbound Connection Outbound Log (OutLog). FRS MUST NOT reply to this
CMD_REMOTE_CO_DONE packet."
TO:
"The receiving partner MUST be the upstream partner. This indicates the downstream
partner has processed this change order. FRS MUST remove the change order from the
Outbound Connection Outbound Log (OutLog) only if the CO_FLAG_INSTALL_INCOMPLETE flag is
not set. FRS MUST NOT reply to this CMD_REMOTE_CO_DONE packet."
Please let me know if you have any more question, otherwise I will resolve
this issue.
Sounds good so far.
Matthieu.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 3:34 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: flag 0x80 in the flags attribute of a remote_co part
Hi Hongwei,
On 19/09/2011 18:47, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Hi, Matthieu,
The bit 0x80 should be CO_FLAG_INSTALL_INCOMPLETE that means local install
has not been completed. With the value is 0xC6 , this flag is shown to be
used on wire, we need to add this flag to the section 2.2.3.2 of MS-FRS1.
What's the behavior of the upstream partner if it received this flag in a
CO_DONE packet ?
Matthieu
Thanks!
Hongwei
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 5:25 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Interoperability
Documentation Help
Subject: flag 0x80 in the flags attribute of a remote_co part
Hello dochelp,
Today while making some experiment between 2 windows servers for FRS I've seen
an undocumented flag 0x80.
Can you tell me what this flag is ? The remote_co chunk was part of a
REMOTE_CO_DONE
You can see the whole flag set in the attached screenshot.
Matthieu.
--
Matthieu Patou
Samba Team
http://samba.org
--
Matthieu Patou
Samba Team
http://samba.org
--
Matthieu Patou
Samba Team
http://samba.org
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
