On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 02:54:44AM +0000, Sreekanth Nadendla wrote: > Hello Volker, > Based on test results and some verification, we have > found that some command groups (e.g. session management) > in general do not enforce change in the latest security > token in the session while others ( e.g. Transaction > sub-protocol commands) do enforce latest security token > resulting from the re-authentication operation performed. > Below is a representative list of commands from the two > categories described. Please note that because of the > effort involved in testing/cross checking with spec, this > is not a complete list of every SMB command. If you have > any follow up questions please let us know. For instance > if a specific list of commands you are interested in are > not listed here and you want to know specifically how they > work, do not hesitate to reply to this e-mail with that > list. Also for obsolete commands, would you still be > interested in how security is applied for those ?
Thanks for that list! I don't think we really need the obsolete commands. What we much rather need is the equivalent list for SMB2 commands. Thanks, Volker _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
