Hi Andrew, I have filed a TDI to document the SPN requirement. I'll continue to explore the difference between behaviors when DC is Samba and will update you.
Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang at Microsoft dot com -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 5:31 PM To: Obaid Farooqi Cc: [email protected]; MSSolve Case Email Subject: Re: [REG:115030312463847] Re: [MS-KILE] "View effective Access - Parameter is incorrect" -- Issue re TGS-REQ (S4U2Self) On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 22:32 +0000, Obaid Farooqi wrote: > Hi Andrew: > Does my answer resolve your issue? > I am asking since I answered your basic question. Thanks, it is great to see the SPN requirement in writing. Can we get at added to the WSPP docs? > I am working on figuring out why Windows client sends different sname based > on the type of DC but this is a side issue, not the question you asked. Can I > mark the case solution provided? Thanks. That would be interesting to understand. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
