G'Day, Per a call with Edgar and Brian today.
While looking at a Samba fix for our Samba AD DC being contacted by Microsoft Azure, I notied that the interaction that is fixed by this Samba bug isn't clearly documented: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14153 That is, while MS-ATDS specified both of these controls and while LDAP_SERVER_DIRSYNC_OID implies LDAP_SERVER_EXTENDED_DN_OID (not that I coudl find that documented in a brief serch), the inteaction is not ccalled out. That is, as I understand it from the patch, during dirsync if LDAP_SERVER_EXTENDED_DN_OID is specified explicitly, then the returned data format (0 - the default, or 1) comes from that control. It would be good if this was made clearer. Thanks! Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett https://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team https://samba.org Samba Development and Support, Catalyst IT https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
