Hi Obaid,

On ma, 04 marras 2019, Obaid Farooqi wrote:
> Hi Alehander:
> I just want to correct a typo in my email. I said "
> msDS-Supported-Encryption-Types was introduced in ws20018.". It is
> supposed to be " msDS-Supported-Encryption-Types was introduced in
> ws2008."
> 
> I am sure you understood what I meant but for the sake of record, I am
> hereby correcting the error.

Yes, this was clearly a typo but thank you for the correction.

> 
> Regards,
> Obaid Farooqi
> Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
> 
> Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority.  If you would like to 
> provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at ramagane at 
> Microsoft dot com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Bokovoy <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Saturday, November 2, 2019 4:03 AM
> To: Obaid Farooqi <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; support 
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Significance of empty TrustedDomainSupportedEncryptionTypes 
> value in a TDO 119101021001658
> 
> Hi Obaid,
> 
> On pe, 01 marras 2019, Obaid Farooqi wrote:
> > Hi Alexander:
> > msDS-Supported-Encryption-Types was introduced in ws20018. When 
> > trustedDomain object is first created, it does not contain 
> > msDs-Supported-Encryption-Types attribute. If you query this 
> > attribute, the result would be what you are observing.
> > For the msDS-Supported-Encryption-Types attribute to be created, an 
> > admin has to explicitly turn on AES support using MMC snap-in "Active 
> > Directory Domains and Trust". You can find how it is done in the 
> > following article:
> > 
> > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupp
> > ort.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fhelp%2F4492348%2Fkerberos-unsupported-etyp
> > e-error-when-authenticating-across-trust&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cobaidf%40m
> > icrosoft.com%7C98e161317e1b4a1099b208d75f736f95%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab
> > 2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637082821735529131&amp;sdata=yQnHO9UdQlxQ5jovIM
> > D40D7fu2FWIV%2FV2P%2FMlPERvqM%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > 
> > So, it is an explicit step that needed to be perform for 
> > msDS-Supported-Encryption-Typse to exit.
> > 
> > If you enable AES encryption by using the above method and then 
> > disable it, msDS-Supported-Encryption-Types will be set to zero again.
> > 
> > Please let me know if this does not answer your question.
> 
> This would explain a behavior we saw in one customer case where a trust was 
> established between two Windows-based Active Directory domains, both are at 
> least Windows Server 2008. 
> 
> However, this doesn't explain why we saw it in another case where a trust was 
> established between FreeIPA and Windows Server 2019 AD forest.
> FreeIPA explicitly sets supported encryption types using 
> LsarSetInformationTrustedDomain, information class 
> TrustedDomainSupportedEncryptionTypes, to bits C|D|E as per MS-KILE
> 2.2.7 (RC-HMAC | AES128-CTS-HMAC-SHA1-96 | AES256-CTS-HMAC-SHA1-96).
> 
> Now, that I think about it, there is one possibility to actually have the 
> msDS-Supported-Encryption-Types missing: when a trust is created by using a 
> shared secret by both sides. Here there is nothing on Windows Server side 
> that sets msDS-Supported-Encryption-Typse, as you noted.
> And from FreeIPA side nothing calls LsarSetInformationTrustedDomain because 
> there are no credentials that would give such access.
> 
> Thank you, I think this case can be closed.
> 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Obaid Farooqi
> > Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
> > 
> > Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority.  If you would like 
> > to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at 
> > ramagane at Microsoft dot com
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Obaid Farooqi
> > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 3:31 PM
> > To: Alexander Bokovoy <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]; support 
> > <[email protected]>
> > Subject: RE: Significance of empty 
> > TrustedDomainSupportedEncryptionTypes value in a TDO 119101021001658
> > 
> > Hi Alexander:
> > Can you send the traces for your in house repro (unsuccessful 
> > notwithstanding)? 
> > That will help zero in on the area of the code that potentially could be 
> > responsible for empty TrustedDomainSupportedEncryptionTypes.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Obaid Farooqi
> > Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
> > 
> > Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority.  If you would like 
> > to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at 
> > ramagane at Microsoft dot com
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alexander Bokovoy <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2019 4:37 AM
> > To: Obaid Farooqi <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]; support 
> > <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: Significance of empty 
> > TrustedDomainSupportedEncryptionTypes value in a TDO 119101021001658
> > 
> > Hi Obaid,
> > 
> > On to, 17 loka 2019, Obaid Farooqi wrote:
> > > Hi Alexander:
> > > 
> > > I have uploaded a zip file name PartnerTTDRecorder_x86_x64.zip. Use the 
> > > following link and credentials to download the file.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Please copy the file to Windows Server and extract the contents of 
> > > amd64/TTD folder in a folder called c:\ttt and follow the following steps 
> > > to collect traces:
> > > 
> > > 1. start an elevated cmd prompt and cd to c:\ttt 2. execute the 
> > > command below to find the PID of lsass process
> > >   C:\ttt>tasklist |findstr /i "lsass"
> > > 3. Execute the following command to start tracing
> > >   C:\ttt>tttracer -attach PID
> > >     Where PID is the process id from step 2
> > > 
> > > 4. Wait for a small Windows to pop up titled "lsass01.run"
> > > 5. Reproduce the problem
> > > 6. After successful repro, clear the check box next to "Tracing..." in 
> > > lsass01.run window. Please do not click "Exit" button. Doing this will 
> > > crash your server.
> > > 7. In the cmd windows opened in step 1, you will see message about 
> > > the creation of a file name lsass01.run 8. upload the file to the link 
> > > provided above and let me know.
> > 
> > Thank you for the tracer. Unfortunately, I'm not able to reproduce the 
> > issue myself. I have two customer reports so far and both are in 
> > production, so it is not possible to install the tracer.
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Obaid Farooqi
> > > Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Obaid Farooqi
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 2:19 PM
> > > To: Alexander Bokovoy <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> > > Cc: support <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: RE: Significance of empty
> > > TrustedDomainSupportedEncryptionTypes value in a TDO 119101021001658
> > > 
> > > Hi Alexander:
> > > I am still working on this and will be in touch as soon as I have an 
> > > answer.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Obaid Farooqi
> > > Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
> > > 
> > > Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority.  If you would 
> > > like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at 
> > > ramagane at Microsoft dot com
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Obaid Farooqi
> > > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 11:06 AM
> > > To: Alexander Bokovoy <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> > > Cc: support <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: RE: Significance of empty
> > > TrustedDomainSupportedEncryptionTypes value in a TDO 119101021001658
> > > 
> > > [Tom to Bcc]
> > > Hi Alexander:
> > > I will help you with this issue and will be in touch as soon as I have an 
> > > answer.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Obaid Farooqi
> > > Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tom Jebo <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 12:41 PM
> > > To: Alexander Bokovoy <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> > > Cc: support <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: RE: Significance of empty
> > > TrustedDomainSupportedEncryptionTypes value in a TDO 119101021001658
> > > 
> > > [dochelp to bcc]
> > > [support mail to cc]
> > > 
> > > Hi Alexander,
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the question regarding encryption types in trusted domain 
> > > object. I have created case number 119101021001658 to track this issue 
> > > and placed the number in the subject of this email. Please refer to it 
> > > and leave it in the subject when communicating about this issue with our 
> > > team. One of the Open Specifications team members will get back to you 
> > > shortly.
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Tom Jebo
> > > Sr Escalation Engineer
> > > Microsoft Open Specifications
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alexander Bokovoy <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2019 11:09 PM
> > > To: Interoperability Documentation Help <[email protected]>; 
> > > [email protected]
> > > Subject: Significance of empty TrustedDomainSupportedEncryptionTypes
> > > value in a TDO
> > > 
> > > Hello dochelp,
> > > 
> > > I'm seeing an increasing number of cases where trusted domain object, 
> > > when queried with LsarQueryInfoTrustedDomain operation, level 
> > > TrustedDomainSupportedEncryptionTypes, returns encryption types field set 
> > > to all zeros. The query is done with Active Directory domain's 
> > > administrator privileges, so access checks should grant this access.
> > > 
> > > However, we see something similar to below, when querying 
> > > TrustedDomainSupportedEncryptionTypes information class of 
> > > LsarQueryInfoTrustedDomain between two Active Directory domains based on 
> > > Microsoft Windows Server versions, the returned value is set to 0:
> > > 
> > > >rpcclient $> lsaquerytrustdominfobyname example.test 13
> > > >    info                     : union lsa_TrustedDomainInfo(case 13)
> > > >    enc_types: struct lsa_TrustDomainInfoSupportedEncTypes
> > > >        enc_types                : 0x00000000 (0)
> > > >               0: KERB_ENCTYPE_DES_CBC_CRC
> > > >               0: KERB_ENCTYPE_DES_CBC_MD5
> > > >               0: KERB_ENCTYPE_RC4_HMAC_MD5
> > > >               0: KERB_ENCTYPE_AES128_CTS_HMAC_SHA1_96
> > > >               0: KERB_ENCTYPE_AES256_CTS_HMAC_SHA1_96
> > > >               0: KERB_ENCTYPE_FAST_SUPPORTED
> > > >               0: KERB_ENCTYPE_COMPOUND_IDENTITY_SUPPORTED
> > > >               0: KERB_ENCTYPE_CLAIMS_SUPPORTED
> > > >               0: KERB_ENCTYPE_RESOURCE_SID_COMPRESSION_DISABLED
> > > 
> > > I cannot find any behavioral description for such configuration:
> > >  - what encryption types should be used by the clients to 
> > > communicate
> > >  - in which situations zeroed encryption types list is expected
> > >  - how zeroed encryption types list is affecting cross-realm
> > >    communication
> > >  - what versions of Windows Server introduced this change
> > > 
> > > When such TDO is seen between forest root and in-forest domain, we also 
> > > see KDC_ERR_POLICY response from the forest root DC when a user from 
> > > in-forest domain attempts to access a resource in a domain from a 
> > > separate forest. The forests in question trust each other in a direction 
> > > of access.
> > > 
> > > I have seen it happening with Windows Server 2019 but we have reports for 
> > > unspecified older versions (2008-2016).
> > > 
> > > For completeness, here is how the trusted domain object looks like:
> > > >-----------------
> > > >rpcclient $> lsaquerytrustdominfobyname example.test 12
> > > >    info                     : union lsa_TrustedDomainInfo(case 12)
> > > >    full_info2_internal: struct lsa_TrustDomainInfoFullInfo2Internal
> > > >        info: struct lsa_TrustDomainInfoInfoEx2Internal
> > > >            info_ex: struct lsa_TrustDomainInfoInfoEx
> > > >                domain_name: struct lsa_StringLarge
> > > >                    length                   : 0x0018 (24)
> > > >                    size                     : 0x001A (26)
> > > >                    string                   : *
> > > >                        string                   : 'example.test'
> > > >                netbios_name: struct lsa_StringLarge    
> > > >                    length                   : 0x000C (12)
> > > >                    size                     : 0x000E (14)
> > > >                    string                   : *
> > > >                        string                   : 'EXAMPLE-TEST'
> > > >                sid                      : *
> > > >                    sid                      : 
> > > > S-1-5-21-1234567890-1234567890-12345678
> > > >                trust_direction          : 0x00000003 (3)
> > > >                       1: LSA_TRUST_DIRECTION_INBOUND
> > > >                       1: LSA_TRUST_DIRECTION_OUTBOUND
> > > >                trust_type               : LSA_TRUST_TYPE_UPLEVEL (2)
> > > >                trust_attributes         : 0x00000020 (32)
> > > >                       0: LSA_TRUST_ATTRIBUTE_NON_TRANSITIVE
> > > >                       0: LSA_TRUST_ATTRIBUTE_UPLEVEL_ONLY
> > > >                       0: LSA_TRUST_ATTRIBUTE_QUARANTINED_DOMAIN
> > > >                       0: LSA_TRUST_ATTRIBUTE_FOREST_TRANSITIVE
> > > >                       0: LSA_TRUST_ATTRIBUTE_CROSS_ORGANIZATION
> > > >                       1: LSA_TRUST_ATTRIBUTE_WITHIN_FOREST
> > > >                       0: LSA_TRUST_ATTRIBUTE_TREAT_AS_EXTERNAL
> > > >                       0: LSA_TRUST_ATTRIBUTE_USES_RC4_ENCRYPTION
> > > >            forest_trust_length      : 0x00000000 (0)
> > > >            forest_trust_data        : NULL
> > > >        posix_offset: struct lsa_TrustDomainInfoPosixOffset
> > > >            posix_offset             : 0xc0000000 (3221225472)
> > > >        auth_info: struct lsa_TrustDomainInfoAuthInfo
> > > >            incoming_count           : 0x00000000 (0)
> > > >            incoming_current_auth_info: NULL
> > > >            incoming_previous_auth_info: NULL
> > > >            outgoing_count           : 0x00000000 (0)
> > > >            outgoing_current_auth_info: NULL
> > > >            outgoing_previous_auth_info: NULL
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > / Alexander Bokovoy
> > > 
> > 
> > --
> > / Alexander Bokovoy
> 
> --
> / Alexander Bokovoy

-- 
/ Alexander Bokovoy

_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol

Reply via email to