Hi Ralph: I realized that after sending you the email. Looking into it. No new traces are needed.
Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 10:19 AM To: Obaid Farooqi <oba...@microsoft.com> Cc: cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org; Microsoft Support <supportm...@microsoft.com> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] MS-SMB2: Disconnected Persistent Handle with batch oplock not protected from contending open with write access - TrackingID#2508100040000955 On 8/15/25 2:43 PM, Ralph Boehme wrote: > Hi Obaid, > > On 8/14/25 9:28 PM, Obaid Farooqi wrote: >> Are there any holes in the specs with regards to processing of oplock >> breaks? > > if this is the intended behaviour, I'm fine. otoh, further testing seems to indicate that even though oplocks MUST be broken to none when there's no connection available to send the break, I'm seeing cases where a batch oplock is only downgraded to a shared one. I'll upload a trace later one... Thanks! -slow _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
