[dochelp to cc]
[support mail to cc]

Hi Douglas,

Thanks for your request regarding MS-DRSR 4.1.10.5.21 and MS-WUSP 2.1.1.1. One 
of the Open Specifications team members will respond to assist you. In the 
meantime, we've created case 2512240040003184 to track this request. Please 
leave the case number in the subject when communicating with our team about 
this request.

Best regards,
Tom Jebo
Microsoft Open Specifications Support

-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas Bagnall <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2025 3:40 PM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] is MS-DRSR 4.1.10.5.21 CompressOrDecompressWin2k3 the same 
as MS-WUSP 2.1.1.1 CompressOrDecompressWin2k3 ?

hi Dochelp.

The MS-DRSR and MS-WUSP definitions of CompressOrDecompressWin2k3 look very 
similar.
Are they really the same procedure?

If they are in fact the same, my next question is which document is most 
correct.
I haven't looked closely, but I see these differences:

MS-WUSP: This scheme is good for lengths of up to 279
MS-DRSR: This scheme is good for lengths of up to 278

MS-WUSP: a match length of up to 65,535 bytes + 3 bytes
MS-DRSR: a match length of up to 32,768 bytes + 3 bytes

Perhaps one has been updated and not the other?


In November 2022[1] I asked if MS-XCA 2.3 and 2.4 "Plain LZ77" was the same as 
the MS-DRSR procedure. The answer was "MS-DRSR uses a different API than what 
MS-XCA uses", which I took to mean that even if it was initially intended that 
they were the same, they could easily be accidentally different. I guess my 
first question could be answered in the same way -- are these using the same 
shared library function?

[1] https://lists.samba.org/archive/cifs-protocol/2022-November/003902.html

cheers,
Douglas


_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol

Reply via email to