Published in Cairo by AL-AHRAM established in 1875

20 - 26 September 2007
Issue No. 863

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2007/863/in2.htm

Justice denied
The case of the Cuban Five continues to expose the politicisation of US courts, 
writes Faiza Rady 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The New York-based International Committee to Free the Cuban Five (ICFCF) chose 
12 September to launch a new worldwide campaign on behalf of five men who, on 
that day, entered their 10th year in US maximum security jails. Arrested in 
Miami in September 1998, Gerardo Hernandez, Antonio Guerrero, Ramon Labanino, 
Fernando Gonzales and Rene Gonzales were all charged with and convicted of 
"conspiracy to commit espionage" in 2001 in a legally controversial and highly 
politicised trial. Their sentences range from 15 years to a double life 
sentence. 

The charge of "conspiracy to commit espionage" is not contingent on evidence of 
actual spying having occurred in the real world. Although the FBI seized some 
800 documents and thousands of other pages from the five, not one page included 
classified government documents. The five were convicted, but on the nebulous 
charge of "intent" to engage in espionage at some point in time. 

"We call on all Free the Five committees to take part in a global campaign 
between 12 September and 8 October," reads the ICFCF statement addressed to the 
"friends of Cuba". To name but a few, these include luminaries of the stature 
of Nigerian Nobel laureate Wole Soyinka, South African Nobel laureate Nadine 
Gordimer, South African Nobel laureate bishop Desmond Tutu, distinguished 
writer and MIT professor of linguistics Noam Chomsky, African American writer 
Alice Walker; African American singer Harry Belafonte, editor-in-chief of Le 
Monde Diplomatique Ignacio Ramonet, Pakistani writer Tariq Ali, former US 
attorney- general and political activist Ramsey Clark, and Nicaraguan President 
Daniel Ortega. 

In an October 2003 interview with Radio Havana, Chomsky described the case of 
the five as "amazing". Their saga started when the Cuban government decided to 
investigate Cuban exile terrorist groups based in Miami following a wave of 
bombings of Havana restaurants and hotels in the 1990s. In 1997 alone, bombs 
were placed in no less than 10 Havana hotels. 

Cuban government sources estimate that since the Cuban revolution, 3,478 Cubans 
have been killed and 2,099 wounded in attacks against the island. 

In the early 1990s, the five were sent to Miami with the mission of 
infiltrating terrorist groups and gathering information about them. They found 
64 known terrorists residing in the Miami area and provided four hours of film, 
showing illegal military training in various camps. The Cuban government then 
approached the FBI and offered to share their information on the assumption 
that the agency was in the business of combating terrorism. 

The US government wasn't interested. Rather than act on the information and 
arrest their home-grown Miami-based terrorists, the Clinton administration 
instead arrested the Cuban Five. "Here are Cubans who are infiltrating illegal, 
terrorist organisations in the US which are violating US law and the 
infiltrators are arrested, not the terrorists. It's astonishing," said Chomsky. 

In the US, the story of the Cuban Five is subject to a tight media blackout. 
"In the US, the story is not reported; nobody knows about it. You can find 
material on some Internet sites, but it's a major research project. An ordinary 
person cannot be expected to do that," Chomsky explained. The US media blackout 
is evidently political, serving to cover up what the government allows on US 
territory. "The Bush administration," says Chomsky, "has refused intelligence 
cooperation with Cuba on terrorism because it would lead directly back to 
terrorist groups based in the US." 

In August 2005, the friends of Cuba addressed an open letter to then US 
attorney-general Alberto Gonzales demanding "the immediate liberation of the 
five young men" following the successful appeal of their sentences. On 9 August 
2005, a three-judge panel with the Court of Appeals of the Eleventh Circuit 
Court of Atlanta published a 93-page decision declaring their convictions "null 
and void". The court even named some of the "Cuban exile groups of concern to 
the Cuban government". These include, among others, Alpha 66 and the Cuban 
American National Foundation (CANF). 

Founded in 1962 Alpha 66 is considered as one the most disreputable among the 
listed organisations. Since its establishment it has been part of the 
autonomous operations of the CIA. Miami police intelligence documents describes 
Alpha 66 as "one of the most dangerous and active among the Miami-based 
anti-Castro organisations". Its record includes assassination attempts against 
Cuban President Fidel Castro, the machine-gunning of a student residence in 
Tarara on 19 May 1963, and -- more recently -- attacks on fishing boats and the 
Hotel Guitart-Cayo Coco. 

Established with the active support of Ronald Reagan in 1981, CANF partly 
functions as a lobby aiming to pass anti- Cuba legislation in Congress. To that 
effect, it specialises in bribing and buying off politicians. But over and 
above mere politicking, CANF has financed criminal operations, the most 
infamous of which involved bankrolling terrorists like Cuban exiles Luis Posada 
Carriles and Orlando Bosch. 

According to declassified FBI files (Document 9, FBI, 7 October 1976), both 
Posada and Bosch masterminded the midair bombing of Cubana Flight 455 on 6 
October 1976 that killed all 73 people onboard. "There were no innocents on 
that plane," Bosch was quoted as saying. "All of Castro's planes are 
warplanes." 

Posada, who was convicted for the bombing by a Venezuelan court, bought his way 
out of a Venezuelan jail in September 1985. He then pursued a career with the 
US- established "contra" army in El Salvador under the leadership of Colonel 
Oliver North with the aim of destabilising the Sandinista government in 
Nicaragua. Mission accomplished, he resurfaced to target Cuba's booming tourist 
industry, the island's main source of hard currency. 

On 4 September 1997, a Salvadoran national, on Posada's payroll bombed Havana's 
Copacabana Hotel killing Italian tourist Fabio di Celmo and wounding six 
others. The following year, in a front-page interview with The New York Times 
(12 July and 13 July, 1998), Posada admitted to have planned the bombing. He 
dismissed the death of di Celmo as "a freak accident", saying that the victim 
had been "at the wrong place at the wrong time". Not one to be plagued by 
guilt, his conscience was so clear, he told reporters, that he could "sleep 
like a baby". 

He had a point. With powerful friends like CANF who enjoy political clout at 
the highest level of government, Posada didn't need to worry about paying for 
his crimes -- at least not in the US. CANF's late founder and chairman, Jorge 
Mas Canosa, was in fact a close friend of successive US presidents, from Ronald 
Reagan to Bill Clinton. 

Like Posada, his co-conspirator, Bosch enjoyed protection from the top. In 
1987, US Ambassador to Venezuela Otto Reich pulled the necessary strings and 
had Bosch cleared of all Venezuelan charges related to the Cubana Flight 455 
bombing. Bosch then went to the US, where he was eventually jailed for parole 
violation, though not for long. Before leaving office in 1990, George Bush Sr 
granted Bosch a presidential pardon, despite the Defense Department's objection 
that Bosch was one the most deadly terrorists working within the hemisphere. 

The Alpha 66, CANF, Canosa and Reich trail leading to the US executive explains 
the inordinately harsh sentences given to the Cuban Five. Indeed, their 
conviction on charges that the prosecution by its own admission failed to prove 
is precisely for having infiltrated terrorist organisations that are linked to 
the US political elite. 

Besides acknowledging the danger posed by Miami-based terrorist organisations, 
the Court of Appeals judges ruled that the Cuban Five did not receive a fair 
trial in Miami because the city is beset by "a perfect storm of prejudice". 
Prior to this ruling, the Cubans' sentences had already been declared illegal 
by the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention who said that Miami's biased 
political climate made a fair trial impossible. 

Ignoring the US Court of Appeals and the UN's watchdog on illegal detention, 
the Bush administration refused to set the Cubans free. In a highly unusual 
move, the Department of Justice told the Atlanta Court of Appeals to cancel its 
decision declaring the convictions "null and void" and demanded that a new 
12-judge panel re- examine the case. Bowing to political pressure, the court 
denied the five's appeal for a retrial. 

On 20 August, the Cuban Five renewed their appeal for a retrial before the 
Atlanta Court of Appeals. Chilean Justice Juan Guzman, who attended the hearing 
as an observer with other distinguished international jurists, commented: "if 
the court really seeks justice, they should recognise the innocence of the 
Cuban Five.

Kirim email ke