TEMPO
No. 06/VIII/October 09-15, 2007
Law 
'Fruit from a Poison Tree' 

The Joint Team Against Illegal Logging formed by the President remains 
ineffectual. Before the team, the Riau Police Chief unveiled the forest 
devastation in the province. 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WHAT it has done still falls far short of expectations. Its multi-sector 
membership including forestry experts, economists, police authorities and 
prosecutors provides no guarantee for fast teamwork. This is how the Joint Team 
to deal with Riau's illegal logging, set up by the President in early 
September, has been fated. 

Headed by Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal & Security Affairs, Widodo 
A.S., the team was expected to settle the logging case in Riau, a crisis that 
led the Forestry Minister and National Police Chief to a tense debate. Sixteen 
echelon I officials are in this team. 

Besides police, forestry and prosecution institutions, the Environment 
Minister's Office, the Industry Department, the Home Affairs Department and the 
State Intelligence Agency are also represented. The President asked the team to 
settle three main issues: the collection of accurate data on Riau's forests, 
utilization of seized timber, and legal action against illegal-logging 
suspects. 

A great task was indeed ahead of the team members. Apart from holding meetings, 
they flew to the location where piles of timber were sealed by the Riau 
Regional Police in the forest of Sungai Gaung, Indragiri Hilir. The wood 
produced by PT Bina Duta Laksana, a partner of PT Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper, had 
some problems. The license was for chipped wood but a lot of logs over 30 
centimeters in diameter were discovered, which was against the rule. 

The license issued to Bina Duta by Riau Governor Rusli Zaenal when he was 
Regent of Indragiri Hilir was seen as procedurally flawed. The Riau Police 
Chief had sent a request that the President allow the examination of the 
governor. Rusli himself denied having issued an illegitimate license. "My God, 
I will explain everything about it later," Rusli told Tempo. 

The Joint Team has met already at least nine times to thoroughly resolve Riau's 
timber looting case, most frequently in the Bima Room, the main room at the 
Coordinating Minister for Security's Office. A Tempo source attending the 
meetings disclosed that the most heated meeting was on September 7. The guest 
star at the time was Riau Police Chief, Brig. Gen. Sutjiptadi. 

At this meeting Sutjiptadi unveiled the forest devastation in Riau. He brought 
a bundle of documents to be shown to team members. The papers among others 
contained schemes of the process of police investigation, satellite imagery 
sheets describing forest destruction in Riau, photos of ravaged forests and 
Riau's animal species, such as elephants, perishing due to rampant forest 
plundering. 

The documents revealed in detail the modes of illegal logging from upstream to 
downstream operations. The process from licensing to field operational 
activities was faulty. The changing regulations of the Forestry Minister were 
blamed for weakening law enforcement. 

According to Sutjiptadi's papers, overlapping regulations created loopholes for 
entrepreneurs to steal wood. The granting of operational licenses to pulp 
plants, said the documents, generally did not start from the supply of land for 
forest industrial estates (HTI). Consequently, the pulp factories faced a big 
shortage of raw materials from the existing HTIs. 

So the problem of wood demand began to spread. Through subsidiaries or working 
partners of pulp plants, timber firms then engaged in random tree felling in 
natural forests. "Forest destruction was thus taking place at an alarming 
rate," indicated one of Sutjiptadi's papers submitted to the Coordinating 
Minister. 

The Tempo source at the meetings continued that a tense argument followed 
Sutjiptadi's exposure of the Riau forest devastation. Moreover, Sutjiptadi 
pointed to forestry personnel who failed to grasp the contents of their 
Minister's decrees on the dos and don'ts for logging. This, said Sutjiptadi, 
prompted most HTI license holders to cut down natural forest trees at will. "We 
are handling 189 cases," Sutjiptadi told the Joint Team as quoted by the Tempo 
source. 

One of those arguing against the Riau Police Chief's description was Arman 
Mallolongan, Director-General of Forest Protection & Nature Conservation, 
Department of Forestry. Arman, said the source, even regarded Sutjiptadi as 
uninformed of the regulations and less conversant with the Forestry Law. 
According to Arman, business licenses and logging activities have been 
specified by regulations issued from 1990 up to 2007. 

The police, said Arman, could not impose criminal provisions on forestry cases 
as they wish. The Forestry Department is authorized to regulate and determine 
forest zones while forest commodities should not be trivialized. To Tempo, 
Arman stated that in any violation, administrative penalties and civil aspects 
should come first. 

Another Tempo source also spoke of the heated discussion with Sutjiptadi. "But 
in spite of being cornered, he had high self-confidence," said this source. 
Sutjiptadi, he added, also stood tall when notifying the reasons for declaring 
four ex-forestry office heads in Riau as suspects and the plan to examine 
several regents. 

Since the launch of operations against illegal logging, the Riau Police have in 
fact held thousands of cubic meters of logs suspected of being unlicensed 
products. Sutjiptadi has also brought a number of directors and managers of 
companies allegedly involved in the pillage to court. 

According to Sutjiptadi, the Environment Law is among those that have guided 
him to take action against illegal loggers. In his view, it is too lenient to 
punish environment plunderers only with administrative sanctions. He also 
quoted a legal principle that such practice was "fruit from a poison tree," 
meaning it was equally poisonous. Sutjiptadi meant that if forest exploitation 
licenses were not properly applied for, the ensuing operations would go wrong 
and be dangerous. 

It was not only the session with Sutjiptadi that proceeded with tension. The 
September 17 meeting was a tense affair too. Its agenda comprised the 
formulation of the team's field findings to be presented to the President. It 
turned out that until it wound up, the team had failed to reach consensus on 
the timber issue. The meeting was continued the next day, with the same 
outcome. 

The latest meeting was on September 21. Joint Team Executive Chairman Budi 
Utomo could not yet make any conclusion. The timber seized by the police, for 
instance, was proposed for immediate utilization to prevent its economic value 
decline. But when the operational method and the authorized agency were to be 
determined, the talk was deadlocked. 

Forestry Department spokesman Fauzi Mas'ud said the police could just proceed 
with the court trial of illegal logging cases. However, added Fauzi, all the 
logging business licenses in Riau were legitimate. "We know best about 
forests," he claimed. 

Under the prevailing conditions, it seems impossible for the Joint Team to 
speedily complete its task. Riau's illegal logging case is not that simple. 
Presidential spokesman Andi Alfian Mallarangeng acknowledged that there was as 
yet no agenda for the President's announcement of the Joint Team's conclusion. 
"I haven't been informed of the announcement yet," he said. 

Elik Susanto, Bobby Triadi (Riau)

Kirim email ke