http://news.independent.co.uk/education/education_news/article3063801.ece


'Nature not nurture' is to blame for aggressive children 
By Steve Connor, Science Editor 
Published: 16 October 2007 


Young children have an innate tendency to be aggressive that they have to learn 
to control in their pre-school years if they are to avoid being violent and 
antisocial later in life, an expert in childhood behaviour has found.

Toddlers are born with aggressive instincts rather than learning to be violent 
from their surroundings. What they do have to learn, however, is how to control 
this instinctive behaviour in the critical years before they start school, 
Professor Richard Tremblay of the University of Montreal said.

"Physical aggression in children is a major public problem," he said. "It is 
not only an indictor of aggression in adulthood, but is also leads to other 
behavioural problems such as alcohol and drug abuse, violent crime and 
continues the cycle of abusive parenting.

"Developmental studies show that infants aged three to four years old are more 
physically aggressive than adults," Professor Tremblay added. "We clearly see 
that the frequency of physical aggressions among children decrease 
substantially from the pre-school years to adolescence, except for a small 
group who use physical aggression most often throughout that period."

Professor Tremblay, a professor of paediatrics, psychiatry and psychology, will 
review his findings today at a lecture on the origins of aggression at the 
Royal Society in London.

There is much debate about whether children learn to be violent or are born 
with aggressive instincts but the most recent studies suggest that aggression 
is the "default" position and that it is a child's ability to learn to control 
it that results in stark differences in behaviour between older children and 
adolescents.

If toddlers are surrounded by adults and other children who are physically 
aggressive, they will probably learn that physical aggression is part of 
everyday social interactions, Professor Tremblay explained.

"On the other hand, if a child lives in an environment that does not tolerate 
physical aggression, and rewards pro-social behaviour, it is likely that the 
child will acquire the habit of using means other than physical aggression to 
obtain what he or she wants, for expressing frustrations," he said.

"This is the case for most children. All but a very small minority are using 
physical aggression more often in early childhood than later on. Apparently we 
do not need to learn to 'aggress'. We need to learn not to 'aggress'," 
Professor Tremblay added.

Various factors have been linked to childhood aggression, such as whether the 
parents are separated at the time of birth, low parental income, whether the 
mother has a history of antisocial behaviour and physical abuse within the 
family. Being able to identify the children most at risk could lead to better 
intervention and prevention.

"Identifying the factors which stop children becoming well-socialised adults 
should help us design preventative measures which are employed at the right 
time in a child's development," the Professor Tremblay said. "These should put 
an appropriate emphasis on the behaviour of the parents, as well as that of the 
child.

"Learning how not to be violent ... is dependent on both genetic and 
environmental factors. These range from the type of parental care a child 
receives to whether its mother smoked when pregnant.

"Research has shown, for example, that nicotine affects the development of 
areas of a baby's brain which are responsible for emotional control." 

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Kirim email ke