TEMPO
No. 15/VIII/December 11-17, 2007
Cover Story 
Antasari Takes Center Stage 


THE new leadership of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) was announced 
last week. Antasari Azhar, the prosecutor who people feel has a questionable 
record, was elected the new chairman of the institution. The Golkar and PDI-P 
parties played important roles behind the election outcome. Amien Sunaryadi, 
the candidate anticorruption activists felt was most suitable to lead the KPK, 
was kept out of the race. Tempo witnessed the entire election drama as it 
played out at the House of Representatives (DPR) in Senayan, Central Jakarta, 
in which Antasari came out victorious. 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A GROUP of women quickly entered the room just as about 40 members of the DPR's 
Law Commission ended their session. Dressed in jeans and white T-shirts, these 
members of the Women's Anticorruption Alliance carried white roses. They moved 
about, rapidly placing flowers on the tables of the Law Commission session 
room. Along with the flowers was a piece of paper which read: "Use Your 
Conscience. Don't Pick Antasari." Also written on this paper, which featured a 
sketch of Antasari Azhar, the Deputy Attorney General for General Crimes, was 
the phrase: "10 Reasons Not to Pick Antasari." 

Antasari, according to the authorities, was involved in a deal to save the Bank 
Indonesia Liquidity Assistance case, intentionally delaying the Tommy Suharto 
case, delaying the execution of a corruption case of a member of the West 
Sumatra Regional House of Representatives, and routinely bribing reporters. 
"It's too late," said a member from the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle 
(PDI-P) faction, when the girls put a flower on his table. "The names have 
already been set." 

On Wednesday night last week, he was chosen as Chairman of the Corruption 
Eradication Commission, the KPK. In addition to Antasari, four others were 
chosen as leaders of the KPK for the 2007-2011 period, namely Inspector-General 
(ret) Bibit Samad Rianto, Chandra M. Hamzah, Haryono, and Mochamad Yasin. "This 
was a democratic decision, nothing was set up in advance. You saw for yourself, 
right?" asked DPR Law Commission Chairman, Trimedya Panjaitan, who presided 
over the election of officers for this corruption-fighting agency. 

Amien Sunaryadi, who was felt to be the most suitable to lead the KPK, was cast 
aside. Of the 49 members, only 16 voted for Amien. Of the 10 candidates, 
Antasari received the second-highest number of votes (37) and Amien came in 
eighth. "I was disappointed. Our candidate lost," said Soeripto, deputy head of 
the Legal Commission from the Justice & Prosperity Party (PKS). Before the 
event was over, Soeripto left the room. 

Anticorruption activists were also disappointed. "The KPK has dug its own 
grave," said Saldi Isram, a legal expert from Andalas University, Padang. "The 
DPR is blind and deaf, and does not hear the public's aspirations," said Denny 
Indrayana, Chairman of the Center for Anticorruption Studies (Pukat) at Gadjah 
Mada University. As a sign of "mourning," Pukat flew the flag at half-mast in 
the yard of their office, near the Gadjah Mada University campus, in 
Yogyakarta. 


l l l
FROM the beginning, the inclusion of Antasari and Bibit Samad Rian by the 
selection committee in the final phase in September created controversy. Long 
before that happened, Indonesia Corruption Watch had "warned" the selection 
committee. According to ICW Chairman Teten Masduki, the inclusion of a public 
prosecutor and police could derail the corruption eradication agenda in 
government bodies, including inside the Attorney General's Office (AGO) and the 
police. "The KPK needs people who are independent and courageous," said Teten. 

The AGO sent five prosecutors as candidates to lead the KPK. The four others 
were Chief Prosecutor of the AGO's South Sulawesi office, Masyhudi Ridwan, 
Deputy Attorney General for State Administration, Alex Sato Bya, head of the 
AGO Education Center, Marwan Effendi, and Togar R. Hutabarat, a public 
prosecutor from the rank and file. 

Of these five, two made it to the final list given to the President: Antasari 
and Marwan Effendi. Yet the Judicial Administration Monitoring Coalition (KPP) 
had already pointed out Antasari's and Marwan's shortcomings to the selection 
committee. The KPP interviewed several people who knew about the careers of 
Antasari and Marwan. The conclusion was that these two prosecutors were not 
clean. For instance, Antasari, when he was chief prosecutor at the Southeast 
Sulawesi AGO, was suspected of compromising with teak wood thieves. Marwan 
committed plagiarism when he did his doctoral dissertation. Bibit Rianto, a 
former expert staff member of the National Police Chief, was rejected by the 
KPP because he could not show any achievements in eradicating corruption. 

These deficiencies did not stop either of them from advancing. These two 
prosecutors denied committing the violations discovered by the KPP. In addition 
to Antasari, Marwan, and Bibit, the seven names sent to the President in 
September were: Amien Sunaryadi (KPK Deputy Chairman), Waluyo (KPK Deputy for 
Prevention), Haryono (Planning Bureau head, Development Finance Controller), 
Surachmin (Supervision Inspector, Supreme Audit Agency), Chandra Hamzah, and 
Iskandar Sonhadji. The last two are lawyers. Speaking to Tempo, a member of the 
selection committee, Daniel Sparingga, guaranteed the quality of the 10 
candidates. "They are not angels, but they are the best." 

In the selection process, the KPP, which anticipated the risks involved in 
accepting Antasari, Marwan, and Bibit, sent a letter to President Susilo 
Bambang Yudhoyono. They asked that the President drop the names of those three 
men. Adnan Topan Husodo, a KPP member, was not convinced that the KPK would 
become an institution which could reliably eradicate corruption if it was led 
by those three. "That selection was just to meet the quota, so there would be 
elements from the AGO or the police," said Adnan. The KPP letter was 
ineffectual. The President still sent the 10 names from the selection committee 
to the DPR. 

At the DPR, it was the need for a quota which later became a target of 
'manipulation.' The two factions which made the most out of it were the PDI-P 
and Golkar factions. Of the 49 seats in the Law Commission, Golkar held 12 and 
PDI-P 10. "If they can get a few people from other factions, the PDIP-Golkar 
coalition is already on top," said a member of the United Development Party 
(PPP) faction. According to this member, in this way they could also keep Amien 
Sunaryadi out. "So, the alternatives were only Waluyo or Yasin. People felt 
these two are not as brave as Amien," said this member of the legislature who 
is known to be close with reporters. 


l l l
LOBBYING took place hurriedly, a few days before the tests. Meetings were held 
at a number of hotels, among them the Ritz-Carlton and the Four Seasons, 
Jakarta. "That was for the bosses. We only waited for orders from the field 
coordinators," said a member of the PDI-P faction. Administrators who often 
gathered included the PDI-P, Golkar, and National Awakening Party factions. It 
was from these meetings that PDI-P and Golkar agreed on two candidates, 
Antasari and Bibit, and to sideline Amien. 

Speaking to Tempo, another member of the PDI-P faction admitted, before the 
election, that all of the members of the Law Commission from the PDI-P gathered 
and were ordered to choose three names: Antasari, Bibit and Haryono. "Those 
three names had to be secured," said the member. The PDI-P, according to the 
source, did not pick Marwan because this prosecutor was considered to have 
played a role in stopping the case of former President Suharto. "[He] also 
plays too much politics." As for the other two names, "They were left to the 
members to decide," said the source. "As long as it wasn't Amien." 

Deputy head of the PDI-P faction, Panda Nababan, denied there was a meeting of 
faction leaders in two hotels which led to an agreement. "There was no such 
thing. Did you see me there or not?" said this man who is called "field 
coordinator" by his colleagues. Deputy Chairman of the Law Commission from the 
Golkar faction, Aziz Syamsuddin, who previously told Koran Tempo daily that 
there was a meeting at the Ritz, denied his statement on Thursday last week. "I 
don't know. I wasn't there," he told Tempo reporter Dianing Sari. 

For sure, Golkar had agreed with PDI-P to keep Amien out of the running. 
According to a senior Golkar politician, their party named three people who 
they were obligated to vote for: Antasari, Bibit, and Chandra. Chandra, 
according to the source, was chosen because it was felt that he could cooperate 
better than Iskandar Sonhadji. "Iskandar is too close with the NGOs," said the 
source. Amien, added the source, "could not be forgiven" because he had a role 
in, among other things, sending Golkar cadres to prison. In addition to that, 
Amien was said to be the most adamant in asking DPR members to be involved in 
the investigation of the Bank Indonesia funds 

Akil Mochtar, a member of the Law Commission from Golkar, said that some people 
from his faction even came out in favor of voting for Antasari and Bibit. "I 
was against it. I said that if Bibit was in, then Amien was also in," said 
Akil. "Amien's expertise in the field of computer forensics is very useful for 
eradicating increasingly sophisticated corruption," he said. The only factions 
that were openly in favor of Amien as a candidate in the beginning were the PKS 
and the PPP parties. These two parties, together, only have nine votes. 

The "decimation" of Amien was seen during his fit-and-proper test on Monday 
last week. Members of the legislature took turns bombing him with various 
questions. The onslaught of questions and interruptions between House members 
even made Amien speechless. Mahfud Md. from the National Awakening Party (PKB) 
faction asked him about the rumor that he was an American agent. "I emphasized 
that it was untrue," said this father of three, who played an important role in 
the arrest of Mulyana W. Kusumah, a number of staff members of the Supreme 
Court, and Probosutedjo's lawyer, Harini Wiyoso, as well as exposing the Bulog 
corruption case. 

The mood changed when it was Antasari's turn to be tested. No volley of 
questions was made against Antasari. Over half of the members of the Law 
Commission gave a boisterous round of applause when Antasari answered the 
question regarding Benny K. Herman, a member from the Democrat Party, regarding 
his stance on the case involving Bank Indonesia funds flowing to the DPR, if he 
was elected a member of the KPK. "I would stake my reputation if the KPK was 
used as a means to oppress others," said Antasari. 


l l l
ANTASARI could not be stopped. According to a Tempo source, five minutes before 
the election, there was a change in the PDI-P camp. In addition to choosing 
Antasari, Bibit, and Haryono, there was an instruction to vote for Chandra and 
Waluyo. "The agreement that the other two names were up to the members fell 
into confusion," said a PDI-P member. This last-minute order did not go over 
well. Not all of the members agreed to vote for Waluyo. "I voted for Yasin," 
said one PDI-P member. 

The situation was also not solid in the Golkar camp. One of the party's members 
admitted that some votes were cast for Marwan. Marwan's election campaign team, 
said the source, was operating out of the Democrat Party faction. "That is why 
Marwan shot up and got 27 votes, just one less than Yasin." However, Benny 
Kabur Harman denied that his faction was funneling votes for Marwan. "Nothing 
of the sort. We let the members make their own decision," said renny. The PKS 
and PPP failed to become a locomotive to gain votes for Amien. "I was also 
confused as to why Amien made such a poor showing," said Yudo Paripurno, a 
member from the PPP faction. 


l l l
AMIEN himself said he was not disappointed that he was not chosen by the DPR. 
He felt it was normal for the members to come after him with various questions. 
"If I was a DPR member, I would have more pointed questions," he said to Widi 
Nugroho from Tempo. "What I felt was that I did not match with what Commission 
III was looking for." 


l l l
ON Friday morning at his residence in Serpong, Tangerang, Antasari Azhar denied 
the rumor that he used money and lobbied top party officials to get elected as 
the new KPK Chairman. Earlier, a Tempo source who is a also a member of the 
PDI-P faction said that Antasari, before taking the fit-and-proper test, had 
met in private with PDI-P Secretary-General Pramono Anung. "There was no such 
thing," refuted Antasari. Antasari also refused to divulge his program for the 
KPK. "It's too early," he said. 

Lawyer Todung Mulya Lubis, Chairman of Transparency International Indonesia, 
said that the election of Antasari was the result of political compromise. 
Although he was disappointed with the DPR's choice, Todung said that his 
organization was going to keep a close watch on Antasari's work. "Don't lose 
the trust of the public to the extent that they do not support their duties," 
said Todung. 

Deputy Chairman of the Law Commission from the Golkar faction, Aziz Syamsuddin, 
also said that the DPR is going to watch the performance of the KPK under 
Antasari. "If it is bad, we will dismiss him," he said. A similar threat was 
made by Gayus Lumbuun, a legal expert and member of the PDI-P faction. Gayus 
gives the KPK a year to prove they are capable of doing the job. "If they fail, 
they should be dismissed." 

Antasari has come center stage to take part in hunting down corruptors. He has 
two choices: to steer this institution to where the public hopes it will go, or 
to sink it, becoming like a number of similar bodies which have come and gone 
before it. 

L.R. Baskoro 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

KPK Leaders 2007-2011 

Antasari Azhar 
54 years old 
Last position: 

a.. Chief Prosecutor, Deputy Attorney General for General Crimes, Attorney 
General's Office 
a.. previously a Chief Prosecutor at the West Sumatra High Prosecutor's Office 
a.. Chief Prosecutor of the Southeast Sulawesi AGO, and head of the AGO 
Information Center 
Personal Assets: Rp3.3 billion 
Chandra Martha Hamzah 
40 years old 

a.. Lawyer at the Law Firm of Assegaf, Hamzah & Partners 
Personal Wealth: Rp3.8 billion, US$12,815 
Bibit Samad Rianto 
62 years old 
Last position: 

a.. Dean of Bhayangkara University; was once an expert staff member for the 
National Police Chief and the Police Chief of East Kalimantan 
Personal Wealth: Rp1.8 billion 
Haryono 
47 years old 
Last position: 

a.. Head of the Bureau of Planning and Supervision of the Development Finance 
Comptroller 
Personal Wealth: Rp814 million, US$6,146 
Mochamad Yasin 
49 years old 
Last position: 

a.. Director of Research & Development at the Corruption Eradication Commission 
a.. previously Director of Registration & Examination of State Officials' 
Wealth at the KPK 
Personal Wealth: Rp545 million 
LRB 

Kirim email ke