http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1053626.html

            Last update - 15:01 08/01/2009     
     
     
      ANALYSIS / Excellent intel on Gaza shows Israel learned from its errors 
in Lebanon  
     
      By Yossi Melman, Haaretz Correspondent  
     
      Tags: israel, israel news, gaza   

      At a Hanukkah candle-lighting at the Shin Bet security services 
headquarters two weeks ago, Yuval Diskin spoke with former heads of departments 
about the organization's preparedness to confront Hamas. The head of the Shin 
Bet sounded quite cautious. Perhaps even he was surprised by the quality of the 
intelligence that he and his people had succeeded in providing the Israel 
Defense Forces during the months of planning that preceded Operation Cast Lead 
and in the days prior to its launch. 

      Even those who object to the war in the Gaza Strip will find it hard not 
to agree that this time around, the intelligence community mostly succeeded in 
delivering the goods. Seen in the light of the Second Lebanon War failures, 
these achievements are particularly impressive. Back in 2006, the strategic 
data provided by the intelligence community was deemed sound, as it allowed the 
air force to within 34 minutes destroy most of Hezbollah's hideouts for its 
long-range rockets. But there were many shortcomings at the level of tactical 
intelligence, especially field intelligence. Even if Military Intelligence had 
had information about Hezbollah bunkers or outposts, this intel did not always 
succeed in reaching the forces in the field. 


            
           
      The Israel Defense Forces drew lessons from its failures, and this time, 
the fighters were better prepared. They are equipped with good intelligence 
measures and also have access to reliable information while in the field. The 
dissemination of intelligence is made possible by Shin Bet case officers, who 
work out of IDF command centers. 

      Another important factor leading to this success is the close and 
unprecedented cooperation between the Shin Bet and Military Intelligence: 
Military Intelligence with its 8200 signal intelligence (sigint) gathering unit 
in the technological realm and Unit 504 that runs agents, together with the 
research division and air force intelligence, which provides aerial 
photographs, has had a considerable role to play in this conflict's 
intelligence achievements. 

      With the help of MI 8200, the Shin Bet has begun to transform from an 
intelligence organization based on human sources into an intelligence-gathering 
organization that is also adept at electronic eavesdropping, intercepting 
messages and decoding them. In the Shin Bet today there is talk of "operating 
sensors," rather than "operating human sources." This stresses the change in 
its gathering methods, which are varied: They are no longer relying only on 
agents who provide information to their operators, but also technological 
systems that make it possible to listen in on phone conversations, intercept 
faxes and decode messages and the dispatches. In this way, the Shin Bet has 
compensated for the blows it experienced - less access and difficulties 
recruiting human sources - since the transfer of the Gaza Strip to Palestinian 
control in 1994 and the disengagement three years ago. Face-to-face meetings to 
transmit information between an agent and his handler have been replaced by 
other methods. 

      In Military Intelligence speak, cooperation with the Shin Bet and other 
agencies is called "intelligence fusion," meaning "a joint effort of a number 
of intelligence agencies in providing resources, knowledge and information to 
achieve the maximum result." Practically speaking, the "fusion" is manifested 
in the efficient use of computer programs and the storage and analysis of 
multi-layered intelligence (measures, voices and data) also during battle. 

      A precise hit 

      The intelligence community has thus far succeeded in preparing a rich 
"target bank" to serve the air force and ground forces. Accurate and precise 
intelligence is of particular importance in a densely populated area like Gaza, 
where every mistake is liable to cause the deaths of hundreds of innocent 
people. Nevertheless, despite its good intelligence, Israeli troops still 
killed dozens of innocent civilians. Particularly impressive has been the 
ability to identify three mosques, which stored rockets and served as meeting 
places for terrorists. This is no trivial matter. Mistaken information could 
have caused the destruction of an innocent mosque, which was not serving as a 
weapons store, which would have sparked tremendous hostility toward Israel in 
the world, to the point of forcing it to end the fighting. 

      It is with good reason that even prior to the operation, the Shin Bet 
coined the term misgrad (a portmanteau consisting of the Hebrew word for 
"mosque" and the Grad rocket), which will no doubt star in the gibberish that 
every war produces. 

      Another achievement enabled the air force to make precise hits on about 
40 tunnels that Hamas exclusively used to smuggle in weapons, ammunition and 
diesel to generate electricity in its installations. This prevented the need to 
carpet-bomb the border strip along all of its 12 kilometers, which most 
probably would have killed more innocent civilians living along the 
Gaza-Egyptian border (the Philadelphi Route). 

      However, it is dangerous and premature to boast of intelligence 
achievements. The longer the war, the lower the chance of continued 
intelligence successes. And at this stage of the fighting, it is not yet clear 
how close Israel is to rendering a significant blow to Hamas' strategic 
capabilities. During the past week, Hamas has fired between 30 and 40 rockets 
every day. This testifies that the organization is succeeding in maintaining 
its steady launching capability. The fact that its leadership has ducked 
underground and it fighters are in no hurry to engage in hand-to-hand fighting 
with the IDF does not necessarily mean they are in "a state of shock" from the 
fierceness of the IDF response, as Military Intelligence head Amos Yadlin 
assessed at a cabinet meeting this week. It is possible that, in fact, this was 
a well-calculated decision by the guerrilla organization to preserve its 
leadership and its military capabilities for the crucial confrontation - or for 
"the day after." 
     

<<0.gif>>

<<tag_arrow1.gif>>

Kirim email ke