Refleksi : Agaknya problem di NKRI mirip di Republik Islam Pakistan.

http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=362549&version=1&template_id=46&parent_id=26




Publish Date: Wednesday,19 May, 2010, at 11:53 PM Doha Time


Reforming bureaucracy a tall order
 
By Kamran Rehmat/Islamabad
 
  
For  a country like Pakistan, which has see-sawed between democracies and 
dictatorships, the evolution of bureaucracy has been forced and lateral, not 
natural and linear, with the result that little works and even files of the 
president and prime minister go missing somewhere between ministries.

Not even the bureaucracy will contest the general perception that it is rusty 
and ineffective at best. At worst, its capacity is severely diminished due to 
overt politicisation and corruption in its ranks and the abject failure to 
attract the best and the brightest of the country's citizens to it anymore. 

Headed by former State Bank of Pakistan governor Ishrat Hussain, the National 
Commission for Government Reforms, set up by the last military government but 
also tentatively supported by the incumbent elected government, has completed 
an exhaustive two-year review of what ails the civil service of Pakistan and 
what can be done to prop it up as a standard bearer of professionalism. 
The commission offers the following key recommendations as the only way for 
Pakistan to get a service-oriented bureaucracy that can help run the proverbial 
ship of state properly:

Greater accountability: The need to strengthen internal and external 
accountability mechanisms to address widespread corruption within the 
bureaucracy;

Enhanced efficiency and transparency: The need to promote greater efficiency 
and transparency by replacing manual processes with automated ones and 
rationalising antiquated and outdated rules, procedures and regulations;

Rightsizing: The need for greater efficiency and affordability through 
rightsizing (most feasibly through natural attrition) of the large number of 
government employees in the relatively unproductive subordinate services 
(Grades 1 to 16) and;

Reform of the cadre system: The need to promote equality of opportunities and 
career advancement within the civil service rather than the tradition of giving 
preferential treatment in terms of training, positions and promotions to 
certain elite cadres. 

Is this the roadmap to recovery? Given the chequered history of attempts to 
reform and deform the civil services in Pakistan, it seems this is not likely 
in a hurry -  considering that the timing of reforms is as relevant a tactical 
issue for military as it is for civilian dispensations. 
The popularly-elected political government wants to break a record by surviving 
five years and the military establishment is keen to consolidate gains by 
repairing the damage from Musharraf's overstretch of his last two years. 

Any serious reforms now will have short-term consequences on the principal 
stakeholders of the political system, including the parliament and the 
military, each of which is in no mood to lose their respective influence and 
its attendant benefits. 
According to Andrew Wilder, who has recently researched the capacity of 
Pakistan's political institutions, including the bureaucracy, 

Pakistan's colonial heritage has heavily influenced its political culture as 
well as its bureaucratic and political institutions. They were never intended 
to be democratic institutions that transferred power to elected representatives 
but rather were designed to help legitimise and strengthen the authority of the 
bureaucratic state. 

The power imbalance between the strong bureaucratic institutions that Pakistan 
inherited from colonial India and the weak representative and democratic 
institutions has been one of the greatest causes of political instability in 
Pakistan since its independence.

With at least three distinct decade-long periods of military rule, Generals 
Ayub Khan-Yahya Khan(1958-71),  Zia-ul Haq (1977-88) and Parvez Musharraf 
(1999-2008), in particular, helped create and consolidate the rot by 
institutionalising ad hocism and skewering the natural progression of career 
bureaucracy. 

Each time there was a transition to democracy, in the 1970s, 1990s and 
recently, there was little serious effort made to institute reforms that would 
inject back professionalism and meritocracy within the executive.  This ensured 
concentration of powers - usually controlled directly by both civil and 
military bureaucracies - in the executive branch stayed put to the detriment of 
legislature as well as the judiciary.  Even now it is the executive supported 
by the bureaucracy that typically initiates legislation, bypassing the 
legislature by promulgating presidential ordinances.

Another legacy holding sway in Pakistan's political culture and institutions, 
as well as its electoral politics, notes Wilder, is the institutionalisation of 
patron-client political associations between the bureaucracy and local elites. 

In exchange for benefaction in the shape of land grants, pensions and titles, 
feudals, clerics and tribal chiefs were co-opted by colonial managers to 
provide political stability and collect revenues. 
After independence, this direct patron-client relationship between the 
bureaucracy and local elites strengthened the image of the bureaucracy as the 
providers of patronage, influence and security, thereby undermining the 
development of political parties that normally would have played this 
intermediary role.

Of the dozen serious attempts to study administrative reforms in the last three 
decades, almost all seek to restore constitutional security of tenure and 
safety from prosecution for the civil servants. 
Both Generals Zia and Musharraf seriously toyed with the idea of restoring 
these guarantees but understood - as did the governments of Benazir Bhutto and 
Nawaz  Sharif - that to retain their grip on the polity they would require a 
weak and subservient civil service rather than a strong and independent one, 
and so backed off. 

However, it is the militarised form of bureaucracy that has really hurt any 
attempt at reform. General Zia instituted a 10 percent quota for former 
military officials in the officer grades in the civilian bureaucracy. General 
Musharraf took this to unprecedented heights. When he was forced to resign in 
August 2008, there were over 10,000 serving and retired military officers in 
the civilian bureaucracy that his regime had appointed.

Even well before Musharraf staged a coup in 1999, the military was a state 
within a state. Today, arguably it is the state - the elected civilian 
government and the recently passed wide-ranging 18th constitutional amendment 
notwithstanding. The military controls all key state institutions through 
either direct control or through invisible influence - the civil service, 
foreign policy, economic policy, home policy, intelligence agencies. The 
judiciary and the legislature are still recovering from the encumbering if 
invisible influence of the army. 

The worry is that due to the emaciated civilian bureaucracy, the administration 
of state institutions is still transparently marked by the invisible hand of 
the military and continues to depend on its capacity rather than civilian.
 
*** The author can be reached at [email protected]

 
 

<<gulfLogo.jpg>>

Kirim email ke