http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=2&id=21287


Resisting Violence: Between Security Services and Community Services


13/06/2010
By Muhammad Diyab



The confirmation given a few days ago by Saudi Arabian Second Deputy Prime 
Minister and Minister of the Interior, Prince Naif Bin Abdulaziz, that the 
security services have foiled more than 220 terrorist attacks on Saudi Arabia, 
and arrested those who planned and took part in them, requires us - as a 
society - to also play our role in this regard in order to compliment the 
successes of the security services. More than 220 terrorist attempts would 
never have been made if each of us adhered to our individual responsibilities; 
if each family protected its children by teaching them not to follow violence 
then none of their children would ever have become ensnared by violent 
propaganda, if each teacher had planted the seeds of moderation in the minds of 
his students then no students would ever have been taken in by extremism, and 
if each imam conducting the Friday sermon had discussed this problem and 
offered advice and guidance to his listeners then they would abhor violence and 
those who incite it. 

It is true that the security apparatus were successful in foiling this huge 
number of terrorist attempts through successful pre-emptive measures, and it 
also true that they averted a huge number of potentially bloody and fatal 
attacks, however purifying the ideology of the country's children requires that 
we all participate and contribute to their education, as fathers, mothers, 
teachers, media figures, religious figures, and ordinary people. If we all seek 
to fulfil our responsibility, then we would ensure that the security services 
are not overburdened with this huge responsibility.

Every family justifies the mistakes committed by one of its children against 
society by holding "bad company" responsible for leading him astray, and 
mosques, schools, and society in general offer similar justifications. Usually, 
justifications such as this are nothing more than a means to avoid 
acknowledging a lack of education at home, and a family's failure to root 
peaceful principles in their children. This means that when such children leave 
the family environment they are ill-prepared to deal with the challenges of 
life. Such justifications are also an attempt to conceal previous educational 
problems or mistakes in school and society at large. This is because we failed 
to provide the young generation with a means of thinking which would stimulate 
them to think in a mature manner about the consequences of their actions, 
thereby keeping them away from blindly following instructions which is 
something that leads to subordination and submission. The "bad company" that we 
now denounce are not a cause but an effect, and they themselves are victims of 
educational mistakes committed in some homes and class rooms. Therefore I hope 
that whenever a member of a [terrorist] cell is arrested, he points the finger 
of accusation at the weak link [that allowed him to become a terrorist] so that 
his family, teachers, preachers, or indeed all three, are aware that they bear 
some responsibility for what happened to him and that "you reap what you sow" 
and that they have no right to blame him, rather they should blame themselves. 

Therefore, while the security service has been successful in fighting violence 
and terrorism it our duty as a society to assume our responsibility side by 
side with them to ensure that violence does not beget more violence. The 
question is, will we be able to do this? 

Kirim email ke