http://www.eurasiareview.com/201008257415/indonesia-and-the-challenge-of-papuan-separatism.html

Indonesia And The Challenge Of Papuan Separatism 
Thursday, 26 August 2010 00:18 
Written by IDSA 

 By Bilveer Singh

If there are any symbols of Papuans' continued quest and determination for 
sovereign independence1, it is their continued attachment to their flag, the 
Morning Star or Bintang Kejora (in Indonesian), their Anthem, Hai Tanahku Papua 
(in Indonesian) or Oh, My Land Papua, written by a Dutch missionary in the 
1930s and the continued existence of the OPM, Papua Independence Movement since 
1964. The Morning Star was first formally unveiled on 1 December 1961, 
symbolising the onset of the Republic of West Papua and flew till October 1962, 
when the former Dutch colony was transferred to the United Nations Temporary 
Executive Authority through a deal brokered by the United States, mainly to 
prevent Indonesia from joining the Soviet Camp during the Cold War.



Indonesia took control of the territory in the following year and formally 
incorporated West Papua, renamed West Irian, into Indonesia in 1969, recognised 
by the United Nations. However, Papuans have continued to challenge the 
territory's integration into Indonesia and a bloody struggle has ensued ever 
since, with supporters of Papuan independence claiming that more than 100,000 
Papuans have been killed by the Indonesian military. The violence has continued 
right to the present period and it remains illegal to fly the Bintang Kejora in 
Indonesia and many Papuans continue to be incarcerated for doing so.

Anatomy of Papua

Located on the easternmost part of Indonesia, geographically it constitutes 
one-fifth of the country but only has a population of 3 million (of which the 
natives constitute only 50 per cent). Indonesia, where 90 per cent of the 
people are Muslim, has a population of nearly 240 million. Papua is a largely 
Christian territory, where the Protestants constitute the majority, followed by 
the Catholics and then Muslims. However, tribalism is extremely dominant with 
more than 265 tribes representing the Putra Daerah or Sons of the Soil 
(natives). Yet, the territory is extremely rich in natural resources, 
especially oil, gas, gold and copper. It is also geo-strategically important, 
bordering on land with Papua New Guinea and fronting the Pacific Ocean.

Explaining Papuans' Desire for Independence

Even though Indonesia declared independence in August 1945 and had to fight the 
Dutch to gain complete sovereignty in December 1949, the Dutch only surrendered 
Papua in October 1962. This represents an important historical anomaly as Papua 
remained for another 12 years as a Dutch colony compared to the rest of 
Indonesia. This provided the Dutch ample time to develop a local Papuan elite 
that was committed to independence and hence the importance of the Morning 
Star, National Anthem, not to mention a rudimentary Parliament that was formed 
in Jayapura in 1961. However, due to the Cold War, President Kennedy succeeded 
in pressurising the Dutch to surrender the territory in 1962 and Indonesia, 
with the support of the West, legitimately gained control of the territory by 
1969. However, this was largely undertaken against the wishes of the Papuan 
elites and hence the continued struggle for Merdeka or independence ever since.

>From the perspective of Papuans, there are a number of grievances that have 
>provided a catalyst and triggered their demands for independence. First, the 
>sense of historical injustice when Papua was handed over to Indonesia by the 
>Dutch in 1962 without consulting Papuan elites and later, the fraudulent 
>manner in which the referendum, called Act of Free Choice (but what the 
>Papuans call Act of No Choice) was held in 1969. Thus, for the Papuans, 
>Indonesia is an illegal colonizer and the territory's status should be 
>reviewed through a referendum. Second, gross unhappiness in the manner Jakarta 
>has flooded the territory with non-Papuans, mostly Muslims, thereby creating 
>what Papuans refer to as 'demographic and cultural genocide' and where they 
>are fast becoming minorities in their own land. This has also intensified 
>social-cultural conflicts between the natives (Putra Daerah) and the 
>transmigrants (Pendatangs), the latter usually backed by officialdom. Third, 
>demographically, Papuans feel discriminated against, with the majority Malay 
>Indonesians looking down on the Melanesian Papuans (for their dress code, 
>eating and drinking habits, etc) and worst still, most privileges being given 
>to the former at the expense of the latter.

Fourth, there is the rising impoverisation of the Papuans. Despite the immense 
wealth of the territory, Papuans are among the poorest in Indonesia. Instead, 
the wealth is sucked out to benefit non-Papuans and foreigners, who in alliance 
with Jakarta, continue to benefit from Jakarta's rule over the territory. The 
operation of Freeport McMoran, the world's largest gold mine operator, is a 
case in point. Fifth, Papuans are also in rage as the territory's environment 
has been pillaged and more important, the forest, which for the Papuans is not 
only a community property but also important religiously, being plundered. 
Finally, most blatant of all, has been the immense human rights violations 
undertaken continuously by almost every government in power in Jakarta since 
the days of Sukarno. Papuans have continued to suffer as Indonesia has 
continued to treat the territory as a colony and where any form of opposition, 
peaceful or otherwise, is dealt with brutally. Indonesians refer to this as the 
'security approach' to development and Indonesia's democratization in 1998 has 
not really altered much as far as Papua is concerned. Many Papuan leaders have 
been murdered by the Indonesian military, such as Theys Eluay in November 2001. 
The continued existence, despite weaknesses, of the Papua Independence 
Movement, is a testimony of Papuans' willingness to take to arms to achieve 
their goal of independence. In short, injustice, intolerance, exploitation and 
violence are the main drivers that have motivated Papuans to seek an 
alternative future for themselves.

Why is Indonesia Unwilling to give in to Papuan Separatists?

Papua is not only strategically vital, being a land, air and maritime border 
zone, but probably more important is the immense wealth it posseses. Jakarta 
depends on Papua for the bulk of its revenue and Papua is probably Indonesia's 
most important 'golden goose'. It would be a strategic and economic disaster if 
the territory were to be lost. Also, Indonesians view Papua as an integral part 
of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia and any leader even 
contemplating giving independence to Papua would be viewed as a national 
traitor, a price President Habibie paid for East Timor's independence. At the 
same time, despite Papuans' unhappiness, the bulk of the international 
community continues to support Indonesia's ownership of Papua given that 
Indonesia is much more important than Papua. Jakarta leaders have also argued 
that to give in to Papuans' demand for independence would open the Pandora's 
Box leading others to demand likewise, resulting in the break-up of Indonesia. 
In the final analysis, it is the simple issue of political, economic and 
military asymmetry, and where the Papuans are simply not in a position to 
challenge and dislodge Indonesia. As such, while Indonesia is unprepared to 
abandon the territory and most Papuans are unhappy to remain in Indonesia, the 
impasse cannot be broken due to the paralysis both parties find themselves in.

Indonesia's Peace Overtures

Following the collapse of Suharto's New Order and the onset of democratic 
Indonesia, Jakarta has made peace with other separatists, be it in East Timor 
(through a referendum leading to independence) or with Aceh (leading to greater 
autonomy and local rule). In the same vein, Jakarta has peddled what is 
referred to as Autonomi Khusus or Special Autonomy in 2001, to meet half way 
Papuan grievances and demands, and rejected a referendum a la East Timor as was 
demanded by Papuan activists, fearing a break up Indonesia. While Papuans have 
gained much in terms of Special Autonomy funds (5 trillion Indonesia Rupiahs to 
date), the territory remains backward as the bulk of the money is used for 
administration and pilfered through corruption. At the same time, despite 
agreeing to a Special Autonomy status for Papua, Jakarta has continuously 
undermined it. First, without consulting the local administrative bodies, as 
was provided for in the Special Autonomy arrangements, Jakarta divided Papua 
into three administrative provinces even though later the Constitutional Court 
deemed this illegal but two provinces remain in operation today. Second, 
despite agreeing to permit Papuans to display their cultural attributes, 
Jakarta reneged on this, arguing that it was promoting separatism, especially 
with regard to the display of the Morning Star and singing of Hai Tanahku 
Papua. In short, Papuans continue to view Jakarta in bad faith and this is the 
main reason why the Cendrawasih (Bird of Paradise) symbolising Papua, continues 
to fear the Garuda, symbolising Indonesia.

Papuans Remain Unsatisfied and Suspicious

While some Papuan elites accepted the Special Autonomy proposal, eventually, 
most in Papua were unhappy as hardliners in Jakarta believed that too much had 
already been given to the Papuans and that if no 'roll-back' takes place it 
will only be a matter of time before Papuan independence becomes a reality. 
Also, most Papuans do not see any major improvement in their livelihood, 
especially the violence against them by the military, police and intelligence 
apparatus. Instead, many Papuans would prefer to internationalise their plight 
and seek a third party to settle the issue as they do not trust the Jakarta 
elites and Indonesians in general. Jakarta, instead, realising that the Papuans 
are being lost, has tried to launch various 'peace talks', organised by the 
Coordinating Ministry for Politics, Legal and Security Affairs, the Indonesian 
Intelligence Agency, Home Affairs and even Indonesian Resilience Agency (linked 
to the Defence Ministry) but with no success. Incumbent President Bambang 
Yudhoyono has tasked the Indonesian Institute of Sciences to draw up a 'road 
map' for Papua's future, but again little progress has been made. All these 
Indonesian measures are aimed at circumventing internationalization of the 
Papuan issue, which most Papuan elites demand but which Jakarta has been 
unwilling to agree even though with regard to the Aceh settlement, a third 
party, with the support of the Norwegian Government, succeeded in making a 
breakthrough. Papuans are hoping for a similar opportunity so as to ensure that 
the agreement reached between Jakarta and themselves will be honoured.

In the meantime, as the deadlock continues, Papua continues to burn. Violence 
by the security apparatus against Papuans continues to be reported, with the 
military and police hunting the new separatist leader, Goliat Tabuni, who 
succeeded Kelly Kwalik, who was shot dead in December 2009 by security forces. 
With little or no hope of progress, with the abuses and violence continuing, 
the traditional separatist leaders are also losing their grip over their 
followers, with many of these leaders accused of being covert operatives for 
Jakarta. Amidst the continuing violence, Jakarta is rumoured to be thinking of 
creating additional provinces in the territory, in a traditional game of divide 
and rule, to weaken Papuan nationalism and quest for independence. This has, 
instead, led to the rise of new radical and hard-line younger leaders who are 
prepared to raise the stakes through greater violence, to make Jakarta pay more 
dearly, and more importantly bring the fight to Jakarta so that Indonesians and 
the world community will pay greater attention to their plight. In short, the 
HAMAS of Papua seems to be surfacing and if Jakarta continues to neglect 
Papuans' demands, the struggle is likely to worsen, at great cost of life to 
both Papuans and Indonesians as a whole, and where the international community, 
with stakes in Papua and Indonesia, will also be affected. Not only will 
Indonesia's democracy but more importantly the very idea of Indonesia as a 
unitary state will probably be under stress and test.

1. For deeper insights into the Papuan conundrum see Bilveer Singh, Papua: 
Geopolitics and the Quest for Nationhood (New Brunswick, USA: Transaction 
Press, 2008).



Kirim email ke