Dear Jesse,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 03:00:40PM -0500, Jesse M Draper wrote:
> I agree with you that my patch may not be correct. I wasn't entirely
> sure how Cil was deciding how to modify builtins, and I'm also not
> sure about the GCC specification. I do think, however, that the
> patch is in the right place, and, as you can see by diffing the
> output files from the two attachments, the extra increment is
> eliminated, which was my immediate goal.
This should be fixed (correctly) in latest git repository ("develop" branch).
Could you please test and confirm that it solves your issue?
Sorry for the long time needed to ship the fix,
best regards,
--
Gabriel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
CIL-users mailing list
CIL-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cil-users
