2012/4/12 Gabriel Kerneis <kern...@pps.jussieu.fr>: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:30:27AM +0200, Dany Vereertbrugghen wrote: >> is this the expected behavior, and can we add a warning/error in the cil >> source somewhere in case it drops an element? > > This looks like a bug to me, but I am not sure if there is a corner case of > the > C standard relevant here.
C99 standard does not allow an empty list of initializer (6.7.8). A bit of googling suggests that it is accepted in C++ (and it wouldn't be the first case of gcc backporting a C++ feature in their C front-end) and unsupported by MSVC. -- E tutto per oggi, a la prossima volta Virgile ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ CIL-users mailing list CIL-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cil-users
