On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:52:36AM +0200, Marco Trudel wrote: > > A work-around is to use the feature-question branch: > > http://github.com/kerneis/cil/commits/feature-question > > I have just rebased it against develop, and your test works in that case > > (with the --use-logical-operators flag). I used to be reluctant to merge it > > because it would change the CIL AST, breaking existing code; I might > > change my mind if people have a strong need for it. > > I don't have a strong need for it but I'm not convinced that backwards > compatibility is more important than a bugfix. So I'd prefer having this > fix.
You convinced me. Let's merge it and go for a 2.0 release then. -- Gabriel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ CIL-users mailing list CIL-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cil-users
