Hi,
I just noticed that CIL (the git develop branch version) messes up
functions if the function definition is followed by a function prototype
that uses different names for parameters. CIL replaces the actual
function parameter names with the parameter names of the prototype.
Please see the following example...
input:
--------------------------
int foo(int a, int b)
{
return a + b;
}
int foo(int aa, int bb);
--------------------------
CIL output
--------------------------
int foo(int aa , int bb )
{
{
return (a + b);
}
}
--------------------------
So there is a mismatch of the parameter names in the function definition
and the function head. I encountered this issue when playing around with
the Linux kernel, where a prototype with mismatching function parameter
names sometimes follows a function definition. GCC does not mind the
different parameter names and just seems to ignore the late prototype.
Is the CIL behavior a bug that should be fixed?
Cheers
Oliver
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CIL-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cil-users
