@Andrea: > No, I think to leave the table because it contains more information > than the colored image (as the trim was encoded in CinGG). The > rendering is not beautiful but not even unsightly. See image of the > page with the table, so you can get an idea. > That looks pretty good to me and much, much better than the original fixed text.
> The Shuttle tables are not finished yet, but they are coming well, so > they are not a problem. > Good to know. FYI: as you had suggested weeks ago, a glossary would be nice. I have added that to the Appendix and checked it into the gg documentation branch as the usual odt with the jpeg's replaced by png-s. I found a few wording and spelling errors and typos that I hate to see so fixed those, but I do not think anything else in the Appendix needs to be fixed any more. @All: I am trying to start from the back of the manual on sections that I have not yet seen in the Master GIT at: https://github.com/einhander/cin-manual-latex/tree/master/parts so that I do not generate extra work in the LaTex creation (let me know if I am wrong). There is a lot there!! and eventually I hope to learn it all but keeping up with MantisBT and trying to make sure GG is working on high priority bugs and features is so time-consuming.
-- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin