В сообщении от Thursday 03 December 2020 02:24:44 Phyllis Smith via Cin написал(а): > Andrew, probably eventually these print statements should be removed after > the patch has had more use to ensure the aspect ratio and different > interlacing of different varieties is known to being reported correctly. > Otherwise it is hard to see errors instead.
sure, I just left them because I saw some files with real strange (display) aspect ratio... will comment out soon I was trying to understand why some interlaced files still not detected as such, for example this https://samples.ffmpeg.org/archive/video/mjpeg/ https://samples.ffmpeg.org/archive/video/mjpeg/avi%2Bmjpeg%2Bpcm_s16le%2B%2Bmjpeg-interlace.avi mediainfo reports it correctly (I hope) but cinGG still not ..... I was looking into adding same reporting as in https://sourceforge.net/p/mediainfo/feature-requests/484/ https://github.com/MediaArea/MediaInfoLib/commit/33776815ae717bfc2f52042f455bc230740f93e8 BUT apparently this file doesn't even have this 'vprp' header! On image front I tried to load bmp and tif - they both worked. I initially was fooled by how snapshots appeared correctly in media area, but as I can see now they used native decoder, not ffmpeg's .... > > sample_aspect_ratio, 1.000000 > > display_aspect_ratio, 1.777778 > > ff_aspect_ratio, 1.777778 > > interlace from demux: 0 > > > -- Cin mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
