В сообщении от Saturday 06 February 2021 00:05:20 Phyllis Smith via Cin написал(а): > Checked in Andrew's patch and updated openjpeg-2.4.0 after testing on > Ubuntu 16 -- just little tests but it does seem a little faster to render > Jpeg Sequence (4.027 versus 4.169 on a small 1'30' video).
It must be noted OpenJpeg is about jpeg2000 (j2k), not ususal jpeg... And even j2k sequence apparently handled by default by ffmpeg's internal encoder? so, why I did openjpeg.qt :} > > Andrea/Walter -- if you have time could you GIT pull and rebuild and make a > small test too? > > I did get openjpeg-2.4.0 built and the results look good, but I still want > > to test on an older distro yet tomorrow. Thanks for the hints. > > > >> > >> > >> I think I had patch for building new nasm as thirdparty (attached) > >> do not forgot to add nasm's tar.gz into thirdparty/src > >> if you want to test this too .... > >> > > Still time for me to test this toda! > -- Cin mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
